• jystfact@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    If not a local llm, then the input given and the output generated is stored and can be used by the corporates in any way they want.

    Once the job is done, a hammer stays a hammer.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So if it’s local, it’s fine? There’s no problem with the fact that it’s generated, but who owns the tools, then.

      • jystfact@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess yeah? Then It’s just a tool to manipulate images just like Photoshop. As I said it’s more about who is pulling the strings.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Gotcha. I largely agree, I think people often see AI images and get a kneejerk reaction on the basis of being AI, not the particulars of how good or bad the image is or the manner in which it was generated.