• thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t think that Photocraft is superior. But the reason why its made so quickly is, because its vibe coded. There is no real engineering behind it, no good code quality and its not even a unique project; just stolen another project. And right now it’s even buggy as hell and unfinished mess with missing features too. Besides possible future licensing issues, I wouldn’t even use that program if it was good.

      I prefer GIMP over Photoshop or what this abomination of Photocraft is.

    • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Feel free to use it yourself then. Many of us will keep using GIMP, battle-tested and amazing piece of work.

        • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My comment was about that person saying photo craft was made in a week and is superior. I was saying that, “photo craft was made in a week by AI, right?” Not about GIMP

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I wasn’t talking about GIMP. Photocraft is an exact copy of a program, that was designed and created for decades. My argument is, that Photocraft couldn’t be created in a few weeks if it was from scratch like GIMP or Photoshop was.

            • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Ah OK, misunderstood. I thought you misunderstood me and thought I was talking about GIMP lol. And yes, exactly. GIMP is just amazing.

              Yeah, read your comment again and see where I misunderstood.