Whataboutism

When you’re trying to claim that statues that symbolise liberation from the Nazis represent oppression, you’re a Nazi.

And you were the one screaming the BlueMAGA equivalent of “fake news”

“Russian propaganda!” is the BlueMAGA equivalent of “fake news!”

You’re really not beating the Nazi allegations.

Lol. So you know you’re wrong, but you’re going to double down on supporting genocide anyway.

Gaza’s still getting the shit bombed out of it while Trump’s off golfing.

It’s the golfing part you’re mad about, of course. The bombing the shit out of Gaza was fine with you so long as it was being done with decorum.

I’m comfortable to say people tearing down memorials to the soldiers who faught against the Nazis to replace them with memorials to the people who fought for the Nazis makes you a Nazi.

Feddit continuing not to beat the charges.

This is just the European equivelant of defending the confederates, except the confederates weren’t allied with the literal Nazis.

“The resolution is bad because it condemns people who fought alongside the Nazis to genocide the USSR.”

Not beating the Nazi allegations.

Turns out when you refuse to open your eyes, you don’t see things. What a shock.

I was paraphrasing you. Given that you were the one strawmanning, that should have been obvious.

IIUC, you’re telling me that when it comes to Palestine, Biden is no better than Trump, or conversely, Trump is no worse than Biden.

Correct, and I’m strongly opposed to the concerted effort to white wash Biden in this regard, considering it tantamount to soft genocide denial.

which is why I wouldn’t be so quick to call someone who thinks one isn’t as bad as the other an apologist for fascism.

It may be unintentional, or well meaning, but ultimately it does serve to apologize for fascism. And I’m particularly distasteful at the moment because I’m see a strong concerted push to spread the idea. We are essentially seeing history being rewritten in front of us.

No. You appear to be deliberately missing my point here. I never said anything close to what you seem to be trying to imply: that they are both equally bad because evil is a binary thing with no degrees of difference. I am explicitly saying that there is no difference in the degree of their evil when it comes to Palestine.

What is prompting you to ask me these questions? Because it seems like you’re just trying to derail. I could start asking you completely unrelated questions as well, but it would just be wasting time.

(Incidentally, my answers are no and yes, respectively, but I don’t intend to discuss further on this unrelated tangent without justification.)

I saw that; it was particularly ghoulish because it was in a comment section full actual, overt hate speech. But that hate speech was directed at America’s enemies, so guess who’s catching the ban.

OK. I can’t stop you from ignoring what I said and making up your own unrelated statement in your imagination.

In Palestine? Correct, he is no worse.

Yes, correct.

Trump is literally the worst-case scenario

Only for liberals like you, who are perfectly happy to support genocide so long as it’s done with decorum.

The only thing that would be different under Harris is that the US would still be bombing Yemen on Israel’s behalf

You know somebody has completely run out of arguments when they start doing the “So according to you , [something that in no way resembles anything say said]” thing.

And just to be clear, we’re not attacking them for “dithering” on the Palestine genocide (not “conflict”, genocide); we’re attacking them for actively and consistently supporting the genocide. The idea that they’re just “dithering” is a lie liberals tell themselves so they can keep supporting genocidal fascists without feeling bad about themselves.