Sometimes I even sing…

I think similar mechanisms are at work there as well, though to a lesser extent: I think there’s hardly any country in the world where nationalism is as pronounced as it is in the U.S.

On the one hand, this has to do with cultural dominance, which is reflected, for example, in the global popularity of the U.S. entertainment industry and so on. On the other hand, however, it also has to do with the fact that the US has been placing nationalism at the center of its culture for decades, ranging from the pledge of allegiance in schools to the targeted promotion of sporting events, where not only are flags waved, but the desired, ruthless competitive mentality - which is essential to unbridled capitalism - is directly manifested in mass events with a participatory character. There are countless examples of how the image of the superior, righteous nation has been massively propagated over decades.

This illusion is now beginning to crumble, however, because unlike its predecessors, the current U.S. regime does not care about maintaining a respectable facade, which actually does not strike me as particularly clever: Apparently, these people are solely concerned with maximizing their own enrichment, even if it means risking the collapse of the entire system.

The reason for this seems simple to me: Even their first, rather pathetic coup attempt went unpunished - they therefore assume they can do whatever they please without being held accountable. And they seem to be right in this assessment: Millions of people do take to the streets on particular days, as they did just yesterday, but this has no serious consequences for the regime, especially since they largely control the media, so that despite the scope of the protests, there is hardly any reporting on these mass demonstrations.

And this is likely the crux of the matter: because public discourse takes place in the media, yet the media is controlled by the very same people on whose behalf the corrupt regime acts, many citizens still seem unaware of the extent of the misery in which the country finds itself.

Coupled with the fact that the U.S. has always heavily cultivated national pride, many citizens likely assume that things will sort themselves out as usual: Despite obvious corruption, they continue to trust the legal system, hope for the midterms, and believe that everything will get better again with the Democrats, and so on. In any case, a majority of U.S. citizens seem to assess the situation as such that it is not yet necessary to put their own comfortable way of life at risk, although this appears to be changing somewhat. If I understand correctly, there are now apparently efforts to organize a general strike, which seems to me to be the only peaceful means of forcing the regime to step down and, maybe, even pushing through long-overdue fundamental reforms.

Whether this will work, however, seems rather unlikely to me. I see it - also from the outside - exactly the same way you do: It also seems to me that the majority of U.S. citizens underestimate the gravity of the situation, or at least that they do not want to admit that their system has been so thoroughly infiltrated that it is beyond salvation - at least if the living conditions of citizens are ever to improve significantly.

As I said, I see the reason for this in a combination of self-deception and the fact that the media are controlled to an extreme degree by oligarchs.

I think it’s fair to say that, on the whole, many U.S. citizens haven’t woken up from the “American Dream,” even though it’s been an absolute nightmare for quite some time now.

I suppose many people don’t even want to wake up, because then they’d have to take charge of shaping their own day.

Yes, it’s really quite strange - especially in its extremest form among MAGA supporters: This “movement” clearly has much more in common with a cult than with a rational, political organization. I don’t necessarily think that the vast majority of people who feel they belong realize what they’re being used for. It’s interesting from a mass psychology perspective, but unfortunately disastrous for the US as well as for the entire world.

In a way, but then again, not really, because to feel shame, one must first acknowledge that one is responsible for something reprehensible. It seems to me rather that it is precisely the acceptance of responsibility for the collective actions of the US - which are, after all, manifested in the actions of elected representatives - that is being prevented by ignoring reality. It seems to be more of a defense mechanism to protect one’s own, believed-to-be-secure identity from collapse by fleeing from reality.

In this sense, it strikes me more as something like willful blindness, deliberate ignorance, or cognitive dissonance reduction - as psychologists would say. So some kind of self-deception designed to allow one to continue clinging to one’s established self-image, even when one is aware that it does not correspond to reality.

Shame, on the other hand, would be the next step - one would only feel that once they have realized that they have lived a lie for half their life.

I suspect this is because the U.S.’s ruthless actions contradict the country’s self-image, which has been cemented by decades of propaganda: the narrative that the U.S. is the good guy, spreading freedom and democracy wherever it intervenes, the proud nation that protects the world and punishes dictators for their cruelty - all that bogus.

Reality simply doesn’t fit this propagandistic narrative: after all, in violation of international law, the U.S. is waging a war of aggression alongside genocidal mass murders and committing the most heinous war crimes in the process - crimes so repugnant that they immediately expose the fairy tales of the freedom-loving, friendly world police as obvious lies.

So I consider this to be denial of reality. People simply prefer to live in a flattering lie rather than face reality: for many, their misguided pride in their nation is apparently so important that they refuse to acknowledge that there is absolutely nothing to be proud of anymore - on the contrary, they should be ashamed of their country, but they simply won’t accept that, which is why they prefer to close their eyes to reality.

Printer cartridges and razor blades

FOSS

What I find most absurd about LLMs is the providers’ business model, since it fundamentally cannot function without stealing the work of others.

I didn’t want to start a discussion about the pros and cons of megathreads, I just wanted to ask whether this is common practice in the Fediverse. That doesn’t seem to be the case - and for good reason, given the decentralized nature of the network. For the sake of simplicity, it would be welcome for some topics, but I’m sure we’ll manage just fine without it.

I’m on Piefed(.social). However, the discussion is still mainly taking place on Lemmy. If there is such a megathread on the war in Iran on .world, for example, I can’t find it.

Thanks for pointing that out. I’ll definitely take a look at that. It’s remarkable how the US has managed to maintain an image of “freedom” for years, even though it uses autocratic surveillance methods not only only on any other country but on its own citizens - and also for years and years. You almost have to be grateful to Trump for revealing all this in such an incredibly stupid way, just to enrich himself.

In 2020, the European Court of Justice declared the Privacy Shield agreement, an agreement on data exchange with the US, incompatible with European law and thus effectively terminated it, not because of the activities of any corporations, but because data stored on US servers is not sufficiently protected from access by the US government (Schrems II ruling). The reason for this is the absurd legislation in the US, such as the Patriot Act, which, although it has been weakened, still allows the state to force any company or private individual to hand over all data processed on servers physically located on US soil, even without any suspicion or a court order.

As a result, all US companies doing business in the EU were forced to operate servers on European soil in order to continue their activities legally. European companies that used US providers that did not comply had to switch to providers that do not operate servers in the US.

Unfortunately, it took only 21 months for US lobbying to undermine the European Court of Justice’s decision: in 2022, a follow-up agreement was adopted, the “EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework,” which is no different from its predecessor at all. The legal situation remains the same in the US, and once again there is no protection of data from the US government.

In short, anyone who uses services that are processed on US servers is not protected from arbitrary access by the US - and this also applies to EU citizens.

Yes, absolutely, I completely agree: the Panama Papers already made this very clear - and the fact that not one of those who benefited most from this outrageous multi-billion-dollar fraud against citizens was ever prosecuted already showed that both the law enforcement agencies of the countries and the political leadership are so deeply infiltrated that they simply do not fulfill even their most basic duties anymore. In other words: corruption on a scale that one can only conclude that even most of the remaining democracies must be rotten to the core.

And yes, you are also absolutely right with the second point: Nazi ideology has always been closely linked to the interests of business magnates. That is where the term fascism, as originally coined by Mussolini, comes from: autocratic rule by the economic elite.

What I wanted to point out with the example of the US, and specifically the Eppstein affair, is simply another example of how billionaires have now apparently come to the conclusion that, thanks to their corrupt accomplices in the corridors of political power, they are untouchable - and this is precisely how the US president is acting, who should actually have been in prison for decades for countless serious crimes. Unfortunately, he is not, but is now leading the US as the spearhead of international organized crime, which is unfortunately still not called that because, despite its obviousness, it is secured by state pseudo-legitimacy.

Edit: Another example from Europe is the CumEx scandal - here, too, the massive profiteers, all of whom are billionaires, have never been prosecuted for their massive tax fraud amounting to billions; only a few scapegoats have been convicted.

Yes, that is certainly a motive for many of these monsters. However, the effect on the “lower ranks” or even pf all those caught in the act remains the same: because they commit a crime, and a most repulsive one at that, they are vulnerable to blackmail and manipulation if there is proof (pictures, videos,witness statements).

So the motive hardly plays a role as long as it is treated as a “proof of trust” that every co-conspirator must provide as a “ticket to join the club” of these degenerate criminals.

As I said, this is a classic strategy of organized crime. And since the current US system is essentially organized crime, just on a unprecedented level, I don’t see why the same methods shouldn’t be used here.

For the US, the fact that the president’s father had proven ties to the mob and that the president’s mentor, Roy Cohn, was the go-to lawyer for various underworld figures in the 1970s and 1980s only makes this more likely.

I suspect that child abuse in these circles is something like murder or other serious crimes for less influential forms of organized crime like the classical mob (Cosa Nostra and so on): these heinous crimes serve as proof of loyalty and at the same time as a bargaining chip that the mob boss can use against his “soldiers.” That would explain why there are disproportionately more pedophiles in the GOP, for example. That may not be the only reason, but pedophilia is clearly the common denominator among those who support the authoritarian-fascist regime in the US.

In any case, Epstein was also obviously used by Mossad to collect blackmail material against influential people.

It seems to me, especially given the proximity of the US regime to the equally fascist Israel, that this is a fundamental strategy to prevent co-conspirators from going public with their knowledge.

Regardless of their nationality, billionaires largely pursue the same interests in order to strengthen their position of power in the political system in which they are most involved.

This is, of course, a conspiracy theory, but the Epstein files, for example, certainly suggest this - as does the fact that billionaires’ companies are all multinational and that it is almost impossible to trace where the incredible amounts of capital in the international economic system actually come from (such as the massive concentrations of capital managed by asset managers like Black Rock).

In short: I suspect that the biggest problem facing people worldwide lies in the power of the respective so-called elites, and I think that they coordinate among themselves in order to remain in power or to expand it further.

This is how I explain the resurgence of Nazi ideology, which is actively promoted by billionaires in very different countries.

The Drifters (“Under the Boardwalk,” “Save the Last Dance for Me,” “This Magic Moment”) have been more of a product than a band since the mid-1950s, when manager George Treadwell bought the name. Since then, there have been several incarnations of the Drifters with different lineups, and at times, different lineups have toured under the name at the same time.

The Drifters had three “golden” periods: the early 1950s, the 1960s, and the early 1970s (after the Atlantic label period).

The lineup included more than 60 musicians in total. Nevertheless, the band is in both the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and the Vocal Group Hall of Fame - with different lineups:

The first lineup (founded by Clyde McPhatter) and the second lineup (with Ben E. King) were inducted separately into the Vocal Group Hall of Fame - once as “The Drifters” and once as “Ben E. King and the Drifters.”

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductee package includes members from several incarnations: four from the first lineup (Clyde McPhatter, Bill Pinkney, Gerhart Thrasher, Johnny Moore), two from the second (Ben E. King, Charlie Thomas), and one from the post-Atlantic phase (Rudy Lewis).