https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-even

don’t look at the weekly downloads if you are faint of heart.

isEven(0) ->
    true;
isEven(Num) ->
    isOdd(Num-1).
isOdd(0) ->
    false;
isOdd(Num) ->
    isEven(Num-1).

it is good to learn C, even if you’re never gonna touch it again. It teaches you what other languages abstract away.

still is

/i3gang

skill issue

fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1631

Pasta carbonara and Sweetrolls share most of their ingredients

just substitute cheese and pepper with sugar and baking powder

Cheddar is a village in southern England
…and Maasdam is in the Netherlands

not being honest doesnt mean you always lie

wait, does windows jit compile C++ ??

On the contrary, that’s why it’s perfect. There is so much evidence in so many different context that positive reinforcement yields better results than negative.

This is congruent with your donkey example.

but it removed half the point…?

i know this is a joke, but i find it quite interesting those two words have completely different etymologies.

Grave as in burial site comes from an old proto indo european word for “dig”, while grave as in serious comes from french.

I mean, sure, you won’t stay alive for very long with a stopped heart.

I meant like, when someones heart stops and gets restarted again with cpr or a defibrillator or something. People often call that being dead, and coming back.

people say quitting smoking is hard. I don’t understand, I do it multiple times a day.

I know this is a definition in many places. I find it stupid and useless.

The heart beating is not a good definition of being alive in my opinion. The heart stopping temporarily doesn’t mean you died, you were just in terribly grave danger.

If a person is defined by their heart, what does that make a heart transplant?

utterly useless definition.

oh god the reason is even stupider then I expected

Because large numbers use the e character in their string representation (e.g., 6.022e23 for 6.022 × 1023), using parseInt to truncate numbers will produce unexpected results when used on very large or very small numbers. parseInt should not be used as a substitute for Math.trunc().

knowing about them does not correlate very well with owning them