Pentameter

We had one null, yes. But what about second null?

typeof null === "object" was actually a bug in the early implementations, and they decided to keep it in the spec: https://2ality.com/2013/10/typeof-null.html

(see the comment from Brendan Eich)

When I was a child I also had this, but for three days.

None of you can imagine the relief I felt when that enema worked. Hardest part was keeping everything in for 5 minutes.

I need an adult.

OOPSIE WOOPSIE!! Uwu We made a fucky wucky!! A wittle fucko boingo! The code monkeys at our headquarters are working VEWY HAWD to fix this!

It’s not, like, a real baby.

You’re thinking a little too hard about a silly joke

That depends entirely on whether the un- prefix only negates the other un- prefix, or the entire adjective.

cap or no cap? fr fr which one is bussin

But if you’ve died, then were undead, and then died again, you’d be un-undead right? So alive? It’s basic double jeopardy.

That’s when you stop adding hot sauce to your food, and hide the sauce instead. They’ll be like “where’s the hot sauce”, at which point you’ll reveal you added it to their food already

Why is that silly? As long as the classes follow a strict naming scheme & have useful abstractions, that seems much better than having to give every node a unique class name that doesn’t necessarily have much meaning. I can’t count the number of “container” and “wrapper” and “content” classes I’ve seen & written, where the names don’t describe anything useful.

Nah, just flex them boxes

Thank you, thank you!

But seriously, it’s a mix of chopped tomato, onion and peppers with salt, lime juice and herbs. Kind of a salsa, but without liquid. It’s a really good topping on a bunch of stuff!

fruit salad

Ah yes, that’s why we can only count to 8 using our fingers

I used to think of myself as a complete pacifist, but these words haven’t left my mind since I heard them:

You think you’re better than everyone else, but there you stand: the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs and your rigid pacifism crumbles into bloodstained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.

Of course this only applies to defense, never to offense (especially “preemptive defense”), but I can’t really argue against it.

No, that’s not true. All current models use output from previous models as part of their training data. You can’t solely rely on it, but that’s not strictly necessary.

It missed the final sentence