• 0 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 14 days ago
cake
Cake day: February 13th, 2026

help-circle





  • We don’t label anything else that can kill dogs. Just don’t give human food to your dog

    Might maybe be a good idea to start. (And cats as well, as the other most common housepet.)

    And as for ‘just don’t give it to them’ … well, sometimes dogs get into things they’re not supposed to. It might be good to have things that are dangerous to dogs labeled so that you quickly and easily know which foods need to be extra protected to make extra-sure your dog can’t get into them.

    (Then again, I expect a lot of corporate resistance to this. Because stupid people will see the ‘this may be dangerous to dogs’ label and think, “Wow, if it’s bad for dogs, it must be bad for me as well!” and they won’t buy it. Or they won’t buy it because they don’t want anything dangerous to their precious pooch to even be in the house at all. So forcing companies to have that label will probably result in reduced sales for those companies. Which means reduced profits, which means they’ll fight hard against any requirement to label their products this way.)



  • That’s the tricky part, innit?

    A few good options:

    A) Set up your backup/restore procedures immediately after setting up your fresh new system. And then immediately test them to see if you can successfully restore, before you’ve done anything important on the new system that you can’t afford to lose. If the restoration completely fails, no biggie. You just have to start over on setting up your fresh new system.

    B) Attempt to restore your backup to a different system, not your primary one. You’ll need a second set of hardware to do that, but if you’ve got the hardware lying around, it’s a great way to test your restore procedure. If you’re upgrading your hardware anyway, it could be a good time to do this test – use your backup restoration procedure to move your data to the new hardware. (As an extra bonus, this doesn’t require any downtime on the primary system.)

    C) Simulate a complete hard drive failure and replacement by replacing your primary system’s drive(s) with a blank new one. If the backup restoration fails, you should (fingers crossed) be able to just plug the old hard drive back in and everything will go back to how it was before your test.

    D) Have multiple backups and multiple restore plans, and just hope to fuck that at least one of them actually works during your testing.

    Option A can only be done if you’re proactive about it and do it at the right time.

    Options B and C require extra hardware, but are probably the best choice if you have the hardware or can afford it.

    And Option D will always have at least a tiny amount of risk associated with it.


  • The ATF at least had advance notice of the Oklahoma City Bombing, and perhaps had a hand in planning it and carrying it out.

    Four most damning points:

    • ATF employees in the Federal Building were mysteriously seen emptying their offices out the day before. Despite it being a normal weekday and normal workday, none of them happened to be in the office on that particular day.

    • Despite all the chaos and destruction left in the wake of the bombing (and ongoing search for survivors), they supposedly found the license plate of the rental truck and called the rental company and found out who rented the truck … all within 30 minutes of the explosion. (And this is with 90’s tech, by the way, so it all had to be done over the phone and mostly with paper records.) Within only hours, local police found the (alleged) perpetrator, supposedly in a completely random, unrelated traffic stop. (To me, this reeks of them already knowing exactly who did it and where he was, and them using parallel construction to find a chain of evidence for that which wouldn’t lead back to them.)

    • The surveillance tapes of several nearby businesses were seized as part of the investigation. That’s fairly normal. What’s not normal is that none of those tapes were ever seen by the public again, not even featuring as evidence in the ensuing court cases. They were collected as evidence and then just … disappeared forever.

    • With astounding quickness – in less than 30 days – the entire site was bulldozed and paved over, destroying and covering up any evidence that may have been there. It was a huge building, the site of a major disaster, and an active crime scene … and they still managed to turn it into a parking lot within only 30 days.



  • OwOarchist@pawb.socialtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devbackups
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Verifying the files are there in your backup is only, like 10% of verifying that it’s a real, usable backup.

    The important question is: can you successfully restore those files from the backup? Can you successfully put them back where they’re supposed to be after losing your primary copy?



  • We need new solutions to adapt to this reality.

    Problem should solve itself once investor capital is no longer flooding into these AI companies and subsidizing the cost of generating that text.

    Once these spammers have to pay the full cost to generate their LLM-generated spam, it will no longer be financially viable for them to do so for so little return. They’re only doing it now because it’s free or next to free. Having to pay what it actually costs will slow the pervasive AI slop to nearly nothing.






  • I’d argue that quantum physics is genuinely difficult, but also not very applicable to most people’s daily life.

    Anybody who claims to understand quantum physics … doesn’t. If you think it’s easy to understand, then you have a very superficial and incorrect understanding of it. Actual quantum physicists, the foremost experts in the field … they may know the math behind it and be able to figure some of it out … but they’ll be the first to tell you that they don’t understand most of it, though they’re constantly trying.