

As a pure act, I can’t see that it causes any harm.
However, it will very likely lead to frustration, anger, and poor treatment of the person in question. Those things are bad.
As a pure act, I can’t see that it causes any harm.
However, it will very likely lead to frustration, anger, and poor treatment of the person in question. Those things are bad.
Back when I lived in N. Carolina, there was a local brand called “Dr. Enuff.” Loved that stuff.
On earth? No, not by a long shot. We would need to get into the deconstructing planets business.
Context is as important to language as syntax.
Context is important to the message, yes. But if I need the context to understand a particular word, I would understand the message just as well without that word.
Yea. Not helpful.
I’m aware of the existence of contranyms. None of the examples you gave apply, as they just have different meanings, or the same leaving with different connotations.
Right, that’s “speaking figuratively.” There are rules for that.
But a word that means the opposite of what it means is not a useful word.
I’d hate to find a box in my lab marked “inflammable.”
I love me some Stratigo.
I picked it up from an episode of Deep Space Nine. Good times.
I thought I was wrong, once. But I was mistaken.
Oh, infuriating, certainly.
That’s amazing is it? That they (grudgingly) take care of us while we are doing what they want, and hurt us until we fall in line when we don’t?
Seems a bar has been lowered while I wasn’t looking.
My loyalty is for sale.
The cultural relationship with time is more important than its absolute measurement.
This was the statement at the top of this discussion. It values the local concept of what time should be over an objective measurement of what time is.
The proposed change wouldn’t cause much of a problem. But the idea under the statement I quoted would.
that is such a small edge case that it’s not necessary to talk about them
Did you manage to overlook this point?
In general, stay out of the ducking way.
kind of my point. Trains need accurately measured time in order to run properly.
Tell that to the trains.
Your last point is wrong, at least as you have stated it. Evaporation time is based on surface area, and the required power is based on volume, but you expressed the amount of water as a length.
Still, metric is way better.
Are there any Russian workplace comedy?