• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 30th, 2023
  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.detoMemes@lemmy.ml•Online dating profiles be like:
    61·
    4 hours ago

    The most insane thing is how common that is.

    There are 3 other types that makes me feel stuff.

    1. Bio: “I am a foodie and like to travel” there is no way that someone is that boring. Fuck, I am a it nerd, I am boring but I know more interesting stuff to say about me.

    2. It is often plus sized women, but people whose profile screams that they have no confidence. When with 1., I feel even worse bad. Like girls, you are so much better than you present yourself. Honestly with that mental don’t be there, heal first. We are all amazing in our way, you just need to sell yourself properly.

    3. As I lived in Singapore for a while, I have something else, women from neighboring countries setting their position to SG and trying to flirt with a white person (with his language skills listed) while not really knowing English at all. I get why but girl, I can’t love you if we can’t understand each other, you don’t want me to choose you if we don’t understand each other. For context, SG average yearly salary: 55k€, Malaysian average yearly salary: 16k€, Indonesian average yearly salary: 4,5k€. In their mind, a Singaporean is rich, and a white person in sg has higher education and a well paid job in SG. The dream of a white knight…

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.detoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Trusting Open Source: Can We Really Verify the Code Behind the Updates?
    6·
    8 days ago

    As someone who can read code, lol.

    In a democracy, it is important that the election process is understandable and verifiable by a layman. But how many people actually go to verify their elections? Barely anyone, so how and why should you trust the election??? Omg, the end is coming!!! Back in reality, enough people verify the elections and the fact that anyone can check creates the threat of detection. That makes elections generally safe.

    Now with open source, a layman can’t understand it or verify it, but they don’t need to. They have to use software that seems to be heavily controlled by non laymans. Compared to closed source software, this is a huge improvement.

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.detoMemes@lemmy.ml•Challenge level: impossible
    1·
    1 month ago

    The source matters if you want to consider investing any time in it. Nigel Farage is a source that should make you completely dismiss it. He is a liar and fraud.

    Nigel Farage himself hates immigrants and communism. His guest is a far-right policing, who blames communism and without checking, I bet he is against immigration. Your source is GBN. They gave Nigel Farage a prime time show.

    So your sources of Europeans blaming Immigrants and communism, are literally political actors who are trying to make a career with it. In an article, in which they complain that their ability of spreading misinformation according to their political agenda, got reduced, by someone that they identify as the eu gold boy.

    In other words, your evidence that Europeans are blaming communism, is specifically a bias “news” reporting of a group of people with a history of doing that, in which they complain about people specifically fighting against their propaganda and arguably winning.

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.detoMemes@lemmy.ml•Palestine Square
    2·
    2 months ago

    A LLM are hallucinating all the time. The idea that people use it to inform their opinion of e.g. Gaza, is crazy to me.

    They aren’t search engines.

    And then people complain about propaganda as if the software wouldn’t lie provide literally random shit to you as a fundamental part of the design.