

Right now, you can’t. Tuwunel has had migration from Synapse on the roadmap since forever (it’s issue #2 on gh)
So for the time being, if you’re on synapse, you’re stuck on synapse


Right now, you can’t. Tuwunel has had migration from Synapse on the roadmap since forever (it’s issue #2 on gh)
So for the time being, if you’re on synapse, you’re stuck on synapse


Exactly!! This really needs to change.
Security is important, of course, but it’s not like vodozemac is that good anyway…


(Sorry about the length, I’m rather passionate about this. The second half can be ignored)
Essentially, the key to decrypt your old messages is tied to your session. On your (presumably) first session, you can get a recovery key, which is a long hexadecimal string, and a recovery passphrase which you can decide yourself.
If you start a new session (i.e., you log in on another client), for your opd messages to be visible on the new one and your new messages on the ols one, you need to “verify” the new session. There are three ways you can do this.
Alternatively, if you forgot your key and your passphrase and logged out on all the other sessions, you can reset your recovery key, creating a new one and making your old messages unreadable.
(The following are just my thoughts on this) The recovery key is a PITA because most non-technical people I know don’t use password managers. Even if they did, though, it’s not like any password manager (afaik) offers to save your recovery key. You need to manually put it in there, separate from your account password, and manually enter it when you’re connecting a new client.
The recovery passphrase somewhat mitigates this, as they could simply use their favourite “use it everywhere” password, but I don’t think I need to point out the problems with that.
The emoji thing is cute and works quite well, but somehow people still get confused and justifiably vaguely irritated that they have to do it at all.
You just can’t expect normal people to understand that these are important security measures, they just want to log in and be done.
That said, most people log in once on their phone, very maybe twice to also have it on their laptop and then never have to think about it again. That, however, is a problem in and of itself, because at some point they’ll get a new phone, chuck the old one, try to log in and realize they have no idea what their key is.


OpenSubsonic has an SSO standard? Which client+server do you use for that?


Cinny is also still a very good option! Especially if non-techy people are gonna be using it, as its UI is more stable (as in, changes less)


Honestly the only real problem that’s holding me back from using Matrix for everything is that it’s really inconvenient (for non technical people) to set up an additional device, as you have to verify it.
I’ve had to walk too many people through this.


So you want the client to save them instead?
What if they’re using a web client? Browser storage? Unencrypted or do they need to enter a pw every time they log in?
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I think this would be very difficult to do correctly, especially in a manner that would work for people whose first question isn’t how much metadata the server has access to


Thanks for translating


Cool!
Im assuming you’re unaffiliated with Linkding?
how legal is this?
Not (depending on where you are). However, in my opinion it is absolutely ethical.
Do you need to hide in complicated ways?
Depends on where you are. For most people, yes you need to hide it, but it needn’t be complicated. You can just bind your torrent client to a (trustworthy) VPN.
That said, these things always carry some risk, and that’s yours to take.
Mirror a couple TB of anna’s archive
Yes, I know. You said that.
Since you’re dissapointed about that, I figured there would be another client that does have support for SSO. I was asking you which client that would be.