Carbon taxes still allow you to waste as much energy as you want. It just makes it more expensive. The objective is to put a limit on how much they are allowed to waste.
I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know how to make a law without possible exploits, but i don’t think it would be hard for an actual lawyer to make a law with this spirit that is not easily avoided.
You can make the limit per-company instead. With big fines if you make thousands of companies to get around the law.
Energy consumption limit. Every AI product has a consumption limit of X GJ. After that, the server just shuts off.
The limit should be high enough to not discourage research that would make generative AI more energy efficient, but it should be low enough that commercial users would be paying a heavy price for their waste of energy usage.
Additionally, data usage consent for generative AI should be opt-in. Not opt-out.
Just make a file system that maps each file name to 2 files. The 0 file and the 1 file.
Now with just a filename and 1 bit, you can have any file! The file is just 1 bit. It’s the filesystems that needs more than that.
I would still be programming. Just that it would be the projects I want to do, instead of the ones my employer wants to do.
Many editors can read config files from a file in the repository itself. And oftentimes it has the highest priority. Just gotta know the IDE of your target and they have to click “trust this project”.
Do they ask to implement quick sort to people with job experience? I thought they only did that to juniors.
It’s not an European thing. It’s an awful statistics thing.
People see a lot more trans people on the internet than IRL. Places on the internet usually have big programming spaces. Therefore the place where ppl see more trans ppl is in programming spaces. So now they think that most trans ppl are programmers. After that, they conclude that most trans ppl are programmers. Add to it the snowball effect of memes and now you have a huge misconception about reality.
For some reason we decided that a lot of formats written by computers and read by computers would use ASCII encoding instead of raw data.
Making a json or XML deserializer case insensitive would just make it slower for almost 0 benefit.
unsafe fn<'a, T>(p: &'a T) -> &'static mut T {
p as *cons T as *mut T as &'static mut T
}
It is a bit more than just dereferencing raw pointers.
Considering that using a keyword to name anything results in compiler (or worse! Interpreter) errors, and that libraries are a thing. And also that copy-pasting code from the internet is a thing. I don’t think it would be a good idea to localize programming languages.
Your fellow man is probably a nazi if he bought a cyber truck.
Also, most importantly. Assembly.
JavaScript
Well, to get a boolean out of a bit array you have to do some operations. So at first it doesn’t make it more performant. Compilers probably don’t automatically make them bitarrays because of that.
However, the memory savings means less cache used. And a cache miss is way more expensive than those bit operations. So they should be more performant. I’m sure someone out there has done the actual research and there’s a good reason why compilers don’t make all booleans bitarrays.
To counteract this, I usually accept it right away and move on. But then I feel weird. Like, should I compliment back? It now feels weird that the compliment was over so fast. I don’t think there’s a good way to accept a compliment.
NGL I searched the term. Egalitarianism is about all people.
Feminism is only about eliminating the unfair inequalities between men and women.
Not really. It’s quite easy to understand. They generally want feminism when it benefits them, but traditional gender roles when it benefits them.
I don’t blame them though, I also want things that benefit them. But it’s a dick move to do it with feminism, which is supposed to mean equality.
It’s not equality when they can pick and choose when to be equal.
Engagement based personalized recommendations.