Fushuan [he/him]

Fyi, using a condition to assign a boolean is equivalent to assigning the condition itself. No need for the IF.

Not even spaniards use them in nonformal written format my dude.

I would prefix them with parts of your username, my PC is fusho, my server is fushser and my TV is fushtv. This way it’s easy to know what’s what for anyone involved.

If it wasn’t obvious I was trying to make a joke by imitating the tempo and the content of what the first comment said, but about addendums.

Not sure if the joke was conveyed correctly.

Yes, that’s is how addendums work. They elaborate on what has been said to repeat what was said in a more complete manner, sometimes with examples.

but imagine if you could set it to the same time but different distance, it would allow you to teleport, that might be too strong.

I’m pretty sure they mean grift, since graft’s most well known meaning is transplanting living tissue.

Your meaning is exists only in the US and it’s not that universal.

I was making a joke given the most well known meaning.

Graft?! 😱

A better proposal in my eyes would be a “improved cross-post”. Currently crossposts are just posts that link to the other post, thus making two separate conversations and double the spam for people.

My proposal would be for a crosspost to act like a true link to the original, where people wouldn’t see them as two independent psots but the cross posting would just expand the amount of people that sees the original. Users that click on the cross posted post are directed to the instance it was originally posted, and the conversations are kept simple.

I guess that to implement this we would need to change how a post appears to people, it would in a way look like a post from community A that shows in community B, but the ID of the post is the same so it shows up once in feeds. Dunno.

but they could sell their car and buy another one

You can’t be serious… Yeah they should lose money with the exchange.

Also, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-w-pdqwiBw

I wouldn’t want to interact with anyone that wants to buy a Tesla now.

There’s people with teslas long before Elon started spaceX. You can’t really judge them for the car they are using…

I fully agree with your second sentence, you don’t have to do it tough, there are avenues in game to do everything. Shortening your play time because you pay is stupid and pointless. The way people demonized the game for something that’s optional that degrades the game experience is beyond me. Saying that they designed the slow game thinking of the money store, when the game is following the spirit of the original very well is idiotic.

In any case, you are entitled to your opinion.

“Or you can also play the game and buy the item ingame for 500RC, it’s not that big of a deal.”

About Dragon’s dogma 2’s character editor system.

They made it more lenient but I stand by what I said. I changed my characters aspect several times and I never put extra money. People were piiiiiiised about the extra one time purchase p2w stuff capcom put in the single player game, as if that was not their norm in most of their titles.

Good game, trash ending compared to the first one though.

BTW, my most controversial comment is also about DD2 LMAO:

" I’m going to be downvoted to hell, but I’m loving the game, and all the mtx and complaints about the easy to travel and such are from people that didn’t play the original, honestly. This game is like the original but better, maintaining the spirit of the original.

Yes, you could buy revival stones in the original too.

The legit complains are the performance issues and crashes, but anything else… Idk what to tell you, they knew that the slow gameplay that is expected of the player would not be well received but wanted to conserve the original feel, so if you want to bypass the original feel go for it. I won’t. "

Decent overpriced stuff of everything? That’s Apple alright.

Panic creates adrenaline and that shit will remove any sleepiness fast.

The work chat notification sound. Aka panic.

Yeah no, that’s Twinings.

When a human creates art, there is some intent on it, some emotions they felt when they decided the color pallete, the form… The fact that someone created it and that there’s some story behind it gives the piece weight.

Why is an abstract monument created by humans something other humans like to see, and doesn’t happen the same on a landslide? Because there’s a story behind it.

AI art is lifeless because there’s no intent behind it, you don’t appreciate the skill of the author behind it. It’s just prompt mastery and anyone can replicate it, it’s cheap.

It’s like comparing human made sculptures with 3d printed sculptures, if 3d printers could create details and work in big sizes. It’s cheap.

About your first point: think of it like inbreeding, you need fresh genes on the pool or mutations occur.

A generative model will generate some relevant results and some non relevant results, it’s the job of humans to curate that.

However, the more content the llm generates, it is used on the web and thus becomes part of it’s training data.

Imagine that 95% of results are accurate, from those only 1% doesn’t get fact checked and gets released into the internet where other humans will complain, but that will be used as input of an llm regardless. Anyway, so we have a 99% accuracy in the next input, and only 95% of that will be accurate.

It’s literally a sequence that will reach very innacurate values very fast:

f(1) = 1
f(x_n) = x_n-1 * 0.95

You can mitigate it by not training it on generated data, but as long as AI content replaces genuine content, specially with images, AI will train itself from its own output and it will degenerate fast.

About the second point, you can pay artists to train models, sure, but that’s not so clear when talking about text based generative models that depend on expert input to give relevant responses. About voice LLMs too, any given money would not be enough for a voice actor because doing so would effectively destroy their future jobs and thus future income.