I mean why critize it if it does not affect you negatively?

Because it affects people who are not you negatively.

Some Republicans are mad because the 401k died. Democrats got mad when their party voted for Trumps economy bill.

Democrats are enthousiastically blaming the genocide on people who did not vote for Kamala. https://lemmy.ca/post/41857939

Like killing brown people in the Middle East?

First they came for the Communists.

And they made lots of love and had a baby called Palestine the end.

L day

Tad rude to refer to children as “artificial limitations”

So Russia bad but the country responsible for the modern day Holocaust receives nuance.

Thank you for proving my point.

So would you also not say Russia is objectively bad?

What shrapnel, the OP crying in advance over all of Lemmy when his post had not even been deleted?

The liberal crybullying movement is growing. Their Zionist party must be rubbing off on them.

The term is almost exclusively used by people who believe that US good.

Using the term Tankies has officially lost all meaning now that it is confirmed that the CIA was involved in the Hungarian uprising.

He is speaking at the ADL. And he thanks the Apartheid Defense League. Anyone appearing on that stage loses all credibility.

Let me ruin Friends for you

That is very likely. But the American economy is feeble right now. Trump picked a bad timing to go on a tirade.

American Evangelicals and Zionists are bankrolling European far right parties as well. Europe cutting off America is better for the whole world.

You will never convince a majority of Western people of boycotting anything for a moral reason.

They boycott America because they finally feel threatened. Just take the W and let them boycott America.

Buy alternatives for whatever is easy to avoid. Buy what is unavoidable.

Evil existing is necessary for a test in good and evil. Whether done by humans or natural causes.

Angels were created as perfect servants who obey all commands without free will. Humans were created as the opposite. Those who have free will to perform both good and evil.

It should already know the result of said test, thus making the test itself irrelevant. That’s what omniscience is.

An all-powerful entity is not bound by paradoxes. If that was the case it would end at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox which is even more extreme than the free-will paradox for which some explanations can be thought of.

Then how does the concept of life as a test work when humans can do no evil?

I did a quick google search and apparently the pope added it in 1950 but it is not canon