I genuinely think that’s a noble sentiment and I share that concern. However, this would entail making a deal with the Devil at this point, and pretty much literally.

Most if not all relevant models nowadays are owned by outwardly unscrupulous people, which means any correct interaction we have with their models only serves to build up the Devil’s throne.

It is a downright tragedy that people will suffer as a result of said models, but that fault is not on us. Besides the fact that they’re essentially stealing labour and data in order to train their models, they’re also using them to dish out propaganda, to replace workers and throwing them in a ditch, to cause yet another financial bubble which’ll flush the toilet when it inevitably pops - again.

We need to let them fail, otherwise we are just encouraging others to use us in the same exact ways.

Yep, we’ve most certainly shifted too far in the opposite direction. I mean, all that’s required for most aspects of life nowadays is an internet connection. If one has that, there’s no need to leave the house - I speak from experience, I spent 2020-through-2023 100% locked in my apartment, only needing to leave when seeking medical services. Even the jobs which still require in-person action are slowly being replaced with automation (see delivery bots and drones, self-driving cabs, even LLM-based medical diagnoses).

The only thing I think differs in our views is that I consider hunting and gathering to have been replaced with other activities, like farming, animal rearing, construction, general industry, generation of literature, centralisation of information, basically everything which makes our species persist and advance. It’s still the same basic principle, as in having lost a lot of essential activities and their benefits.

Complexity is an inevitable result of development, and we’ve developed so much that our needs have both expanded and developed with us. I don’t think either hunting or gathering, or both would be enough for us anymore. I most certainly also believe that we don’t need mass production at the scales we’re seeing today, but our complexity demands similar complexity in the palette of professions (not my favourite word to express the concept of “life work,” but there it is…).

I think what we need is to walk back on automation and rethink the whole assembly line bit, give humans some space to specialise should their system need it. Contemporary Society seems better suited to serve people who tend to become Jacks of All Trades, but that’s just one point on a huge spectrum.

I think humanity has grown restless due to the granularisation of work. It is no longer necessary to develop an overall understanding of an entire domain for most jobs, as they’re based on the assembly line principle - learn to screw that bolt on tight enough, and your job is done. Nevermind the rest of the car, not your assignment.

I suspect this leaves a lot of cognitive bandwidth essentially unused, so the brain naturally seeks to fill it up with whatever else is at hand.

In addition, this has also somewhat stolen the satisfaction of understanding the context of our work, of seeing that it’s not just wasted time, essentially. Work/production/creation/generation/transformation used to be far more significant parts of both our lives as well as our overall fulfilment, so we’re now basically overclocked PCs left running Minesweeper at 100%, which yearn for meaning and something to fill up all of that available compute potential. And there’s cognitive junk food a-plenty, but just like junk food, it rarely satisfies long-term.

This, I think, also spreads ripples across other aspects of our lives - I’m thinking here especially about the seeming death of nuance in general discourse as one of the main such repercussions, so it’s yet another existential cascade failure.

I mostly say this and the above solely on an anecdotal basis, but it is a pretty large basis, considering it consists of roughly 80% of all previous coworkers and professional acquaintances in over a decade, both domestic and otherwise.