

There are far more male programmers… As a programmer, be gay or stay alone… Choose!


There are far more male programmers… As a programmer, be gay or stay alone… Choose!


People often involved with piracy probably love entering personal information in that context…


Yeah, few people know that the FBI tells you the progress when hacking them.
Wish you good luck!
Had 2 interviews for a dev role with company 1… Still couln’t decide whether to hire me.
Got 1 interview with a different smaller company… They offered me a position immediately. I accepted. Working there for years now.
Germany…




Nah, it could be a white AF looking person from Germany that shared a meme of the vice president…


Thanks.
“Outline” looks interesting… Bad project name (hard to find), but good job.
you can link between notes and add plugin to see the graph. To get a note link, click on it with right button and there is an option to copy a link to that note. You can also link to a section of note with hashtags
Thanks. But I’m immediately asking myself, why Joplin had to reinvent the wheel here. Some other apps to the same. I get that Markdown itself was “underspecified”.
But why does a link to a different note need to look like this?
[Test](:/981236487219346972134687216439723)
A colon followed by a / and the name of the file without its extension (md)… This kind of makes sure that other markdown apps won’t be able to handle it. I know that others use [[Name]] notation or @@Name notation, but why not just sticking to the basics and using something like…
[Test](981236487219346972134687216439723.md)
…?
its hard to find something that fits you 100 %, but you can try make your own, that is how most of the foss projects start :)
True


I like Jopin, but the user experience feels a bit old (don’t want to say outdated) compared to something like Logseq.
And I also like the idea of links between notes and it becoming a graph. My nested folder structure in Joplin has gotten large.
I don’t like that Joplin does not store the notes as real markdown. They are not readable by humans until you export them.
I do not want Wysiwyg via mouse, e.g. by clicking the “bold” button. Trying out Logseq felt really good. For example, it allows to open sections of a large file on the right, which is nice, because you can easily focus on that part.
I like how Logseq has a nice “table of content” plugin that renders the TOC on the side instead of injecting it into the markdown file, which is not nice, because the file changes and you need to always update the TOC.
But I also don’t like what others describe here about Logseq’s markdown handling. A heading being after a bullet point feels wrong.
Adding functionality to Joplin via Plugins is an option, but the plugins will maybe not work on Android…
IMO, there is no optimal solution for me. I like parts of Joplin and others of Logseq, but there is no solution that has all of them.
I’m using it for backups. Compared to Dropbox and similar, it’s very cheap


Me at layer 4 losing my pants, grabing them, leading to a collapse of the whole thing…
I gave it a harder software dev task a few weeks ago… Something that is not answered on the internet… It was as clueless as me, but compared to me, it made up shit that could never work.


Name should be pixeled IMO.
For some people, doing this easy stuff can be the first step into a world where you hear push, pull, merge, commit, …, but don’t actually know what that means.
AGI is currently just a buzzword anyway…
Microsoft defines AGI in contracts in dollars of earnings…
If you’d travel in time 5 years back and show the currently best GPT to someone, he/she would probably accept it as AGI.
I’ve seen multiple experts in German television explaining that LLMs will reach the AGI state within a few years…
(That does not mean that the CEO guy isn’t a fool. Let’s wait for the first larger problem that requires not writing new code, but rather dealing with a bug, something not documented, or similar…)
But you kind of have to leave the house for that… I mean… We talk about programmers…
/s