data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39332/39332afa99fed1b930f1bf465b3a0bfb36f3333c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0d83/c0d83eca0cc68c837c06013e51f8723dbcf373bd" alt=""
1·
5 days agoyup, that’s my point. we judge the suppliers but the supply side’s motivations are much more straightforward than that of those on the demand side.
yup, that’s my point. we judge the suppliers but the supply side’s motivations are much more straightforward than that of those on the demand side.
it’s supply/demand. there’s much more cameras and people online than 10-20 years ago, so the supply is plenty. people paying for this content is much more mysterious to me. why would I ever do that?!
And that’s an outstanding explanation to why the OF supply infiltrated GW sites (and generally good points on the consent aspect). The net non-pro content remains more abundant than it was a decade or two ago, so it’s not like there was a net loss, it’s just the commercialization “tainted” some people’s “fun.”
Also, the more people pay for it the more infiltration of content promotion you’ll see into communities that are supposed to revolve around pure exhibitionism and “altruism”.