Virtually all of your examples involve US hegemony instigating and winning, the same group doing the current stuff. Why does a war ending count as becoming less evil if it’s always by the same instigator and they keep winning, jumping from conflict to conflict? Have you considered that the evil keeps winning and suppressing the good through compliance or murder?
What is we compare the most intense 25 years of the 20th to the current 25 and label the instigators?
You’re 21, check back in a decade and you’ll see.
Thank you for the honesty, I do believe you fwiw, it’s in line with general business practices
You have to link a source for something that offhandedly horrific
Lol “being correct” in a language. Take a course in linguistics.
You got it, dialects are a widely varying thing!
Depends on the context IMO
Based on what info?
Testing 1 2 3
Yes we call it “the legal system”
I don’t answer false dichotomies.
Yes if you say in a social setting you are going to kill the president, or if you called in a bomb threat to an airline, these are social nonos that can get you on the no fly list.
You’re assuming they have no other debt, as medical debt doesn’t influence your credit and you can’t be forced to pay it unlike other forms of debt, making it the last form of debt to pay off (and most have some larger crippling debt that comes first). You’re assuming they’re paid more than minimum wage (~15k a year), so 1/15 of their yearly income, and that already cannot afford housing and food. You’re assuming they have a consistent income and aren’t seasonal only.
Social misdeeds also remove you from being able to fly in the US, maybe I’m missing something…
So it’s a social media, made by China, making it Chinese social media. If you want to argue that its not the social media used by the Chinese, that’s different and should be phrased more clearly.
A fellow anarchist I see :)