Rinse - Plebbit Dev

Working on Plebbit.com - A decentralized P2P social media protocol

  • 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 21st, 2025

help-circle

  • I decided to take a look through the boards and it only took me less than a minute to find the n word being used. We have no control over that as the devs, but you as the user can choose to filter by tags/keywords/NSFW etc. If you go to the settings in Seedit you will find the option.

    In its early days the internet was used mostly for porn as well, it doesn’t make sense to dismiss a whole project based on disagreements with people using it.

    Oh, and all the accounts are truly anonymous, rather than pseudoanonymous, which must make moderation a nightmare. Moderation being technically possible doesn’t make it easy or practical to do.

    That is up to the sub owner, they can mandate a SMS challenge or any kind of KYC challenge if they would like. Users who get banned will automatically be disregarded by the of the swarm.

    I don’t want an unmoderated experience by default, either. The moderation is on the community level, there are no global admins. If you run a community, you can moderate it however you like, or assign somebody to moderate it for you.






  • Each peer is a server That’s not true, you can be a peer in the network without posting or seeding anything to the network.

    peer that created the “sub” have control to be able to moderate things If you create your own community, you will be able to moderate it, yes. Why would people create communities when it can’t be moderated?

    With Plebbit there’s no global admins like Reddit, so you fully own your community and nobody can take it away from you.

    You have to maintain your peer always online, because it’s a server If the community node is down, but other peers in the network are online and providing the community’s data, then people will still be able to read and navigate the community in read-only mode. They can’t publish new votes/comments/edits to it, because all updates has to come from the community node.

    Traffic happens over IPFS, which is sloooooow Not true, try the desktop app of Seedit and you will see for yourself.





  • Voting power decided by buying power is about the most undemocratic system possible short of autocracy

    The token is not forced upon anyone, and even if we start including it in the clients somehow, anybody can fork the clients and remove any token related stuff out of it.

    Tokenizing your own project is a great way of supporting development without selling shares to VCs who only care about hyper growth, regardless of the ideals of the project.

    Obfuscating the purpose and structure of your organization to either intentionally or unwittingly dodge regulations that would protect your shareholders is not a great look.

    Not sure what you mean by that, everything we do is out in the open.








  • Is it a problem though? There are thousands of email providers you can choose form, and they still work fine for sending and receiving email.

    An email provider as well as mastodon provider can:

    • Read incoming messages
    • Block me from sending messages to specific people
    • Block me from fetching content I want

    Can I choose another email provider that will let me do what I want? Yeah maybe I can find one, or maybe I can run my one, but then these big email providers they’re gonna start blocking or throttling self hosters making it infeasible or extremely incovienet to run your own email instance.

    Not to mention, there’s a financial + time cost to setting up your own email/mastodon instances that most people won’t bother with.

    Look at Bittorrent or Plebbit as an example, running a full p2p node is literally a single click and nobody can censor you. The barrier of entry for self hosters is much lower.

    One your point on power law, the fediverse is pretty healthy.

    Mastodon social controles a big chunk of the network, that’s not healthy imo. That’s a huge power of the network.

    imo moderation of the network should never be at the center, rather it should be pushed to the edges of the network (users). I like Bluesky’s model of subscribing to someone’s labels of the content, and maybe we’re gonna have something similar in Plebbit as well. In Plebbit currently you can choose which communities you subscribe to, and you can also filter by NSFW and other tags, so you’re not really forced to see content you don’t like.

    Also community owners set the rules for their own communities and enforce it however they like, there are no global admins.