Then groups clash directly. People were simply killed for being in the wrong territory. How should resources be managed? You can open borders but then roads won’t be free.

I still agree though that borders are wrong.

The lies that a community believes define that community. They want you to be part of their community.

have 1000 people hunting every 1 deer

and they will hunt 1000 people, until one survives.

With individuality and no joined identity, humans will turn on humans, especially after having seen the walking dead. The idea is planted into the minds.

How many planes will fly to Europe when things get really bad, to bring home everybody with dual citizenship and their loved ones?

Maybe India still has many movies playing in Switzerland? It’s suspicious when you ask where somebody is from and they mention the place they see on TV.

rabber@lemmy.ca’s comment:

Iceland and nowhere even comes close

This is interesting.

I honestly don’t know what I would do since I rely on the city.

You need some bottles of water.

Something to consider: How do you cook your rice without electricity?

Thanks. I should have known.

To your believes: Welcome to the end of the Sovjet Union.

We are living in a consumer society because people want to be free without being free. Which interestingly allows ‘libertarians’ to exist because common workers don’t want to be quotation-mark-free libertarians and defend their freedom.

I like how the development of the word makes your point. The word lost its meaning and became kind of an insult. How can the working class not be grifted when they lose the words to analyze their situation?

The problem with tyranny.gov is that the ‘libertarians’ of today will become the officers and ministers of tyranny.gov. So instead of calling them ‘libertarians’ we should call them something else or everything will stay the same just with new names.

Then they are not libertarians but something else. This doesn’t make those people less problematic, though.

As the name implies, libertarians want to be free.

Tyranny.gov rules by law which prohibits what you are allowed to do and thus think, thus limiting freedom.

Tyranny.com has no laws, just costs, which can be restructured by a single person. Thus the person feels free.

Who wants an intelligent sex bot? You could as well do regular dating.

That other reason, too often it’s Western intervention.

As a consequence, I believe that there won’t be a peaceful transition into a multipolar world, because that could have already happened.

That advantage could have been given up and shared. Instead it is defended, even with military power. Why fight those wars now and make enemies?

Is there not?

The surveillance of chats and the prohibition of encryption in many Western countries must have a purpose. It mostly makes sense if democracy is dismantled.

Since the West doesn’t show signs of sharing resources voluntarily, my prediction is that the West is willing to fight a nuclear war to preserve its lead which cannot happen in a democracy.

Without that war, Asia will take over as the center of commerce and innovation. The brightest will move there, which means that the remaining people in the West have to be innovative without the main ingredience for innovation.

Life will find a way. Going back can be used to create nuclear winter but even then, life will go on.

To completely screw over the world, I would go into the future and acquire the source code for a general AI.

Then the world can be locked down and robots can be built to abuse every human and sentinent being individually, for a very long time.