Same here. It wasn’t required.
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
The fed gov could lower their taxes that are used for it, and the states could raise theirs. The fed should not be taking care of states except helping in emergency situations. States should be taking care of themselves financially.
I get what you’re saying, but you’re also saying some states are too dumb. If their leaders are too dumb, then they can replace their leaders, same as we do with the fed gov.
sfu@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Teslas have been consuming a lot of gasoline lately.English11·14 days agoOr maybe a cult of personality has you captured, preventing you from being able to see it from both sides point of view as I am doing.
You don’t have to agree with the other side in order to see it from their perspective.
sfu@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Teslas have been consuming a lot of gasoline lately.English12·14 days agoYou know what, the first time, I totally read your comment completely different than how you meant it. So my previous reply would have been different.
Even so, my comment was not disgusting, it was just using logic.
sfu@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Teslas have been consuming a lot of gasoline lately.English15·14 days agodeleted by creator
sfu@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•We should use AI and VR to build a life simulator for psychopaths and narcissists then hand it to Trump, Elon, Zuck, etc so they can keep doing what they're doing without actually affecting usEnglish23·15 days agolol, okay that’s funny. But there are people on both sides I’d give it to.
sfu@lemm.eeto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Teslas have been consuming a lot of gasoline lately.English1930·15 days agoEveryone acting like its okay to burn up teslas of uninvolved people because you disapprove of what Musk is doing. Then you should have no argument against pro-lifers burning down abortion clinics because they disapprove of what the doctors there are doing. Just saying.
“Oh no, what will we ever do if the federal government doesn’t set our standards? We are too dumb to set our own standards!”
I’m pretty sure the states can figure it out on their own. And any school can feel free to set their own standards even higher if they wish.
The removal of the DOE will just allow states to be in charge of their schools, instead of the federal gov. It doesn’t need to be federalized. Most things should be state run, not federal run. The point of having states is so people can more choice in what they want for themselves.
If you like the way state B operates better than the state F operates, then you have the ability to either move to State F, or to work on convincing those in state B to change the way they operate. But when the fed runs it, you’re stuck with it.
Umm, removal of DOE does not remove schools.
Not having non-destructive editing has kept me from using gimp. I tried but just couldn’t use it. I’ll have to try again.
I get what you’re saying, but I still think the federal gov has there hands in too many things. The states can be responsible for themselves, if they aren’t doing a good job, then it’s up to the people to vote in leaders who will do a better job.