Even if the image was regenerated with tweaked prompts until the generated image expressed what the prompter wanted to convey?

A new web browser engine that is not Google or Mozilla (like Servo) and a browser using this new engine.

I would assume it is OneDev, as the previous poster tried it as an alternative to Forgejo.

How do you know that OP does not have a master in russian politics? Don’t assume about other people who you know nothing about.

Your reply is not even on topic. Instead of answering what you would do, or just generally talk about the topic, you verbally assault OP.

That user looks to be banned now.

Had the same issue before, cable was the cause.

https://docker-curriculum.com/
Best resource I found so far. I tried docker’s tutorial but it was not good at all.

I should look into AWS as well. Currently using a refurbished Datto NAS, running debian with everything in docker. I also have a r710! But I don’t have room for it at the moment.

I would never handle email myself. I would instead use a provider, turn off all filters and set up a mail server locally that works via the provider.
That way I don’t have to convince my ISP to set up a PTR for me, handle DMARC or SPF. Or care if my IP is blacklisted.

I assume a lot of people interested in selfhosting also enjoy the hardware side of things, making it more prominent than VPS.

It does look fishy.

It is overwhelmingly clear that you are not arguing in good faith. You are trying to argue points I explicitly said I am not arguing or discussing. But I will explain again. I will also use the word image instead of post to make it more clear what I mean, just in case that was confusing you.

Let us break this down.

It’s overwhelmingly clear that you need to do more legwork to prove that that user genuinely thinks there is no credit score

I have never tried to prove this. I said that the image claims that there is no system for social credit score. I do not equate the image to users in general. I even suspect that this image could be fake.

and is not directly responding to the Orwellian version.

Was I not clear enough? I am not discussing anything about any version of the system in question, only it’s existance. Image says it does not exist, we both agree that it does. Again, I am not saying anything about how it works or how it is perceived.

This is clearly taking a dogmatic reading of one sentence to come up with the absurd claim that Chinese citizens believe that publicly stated policy doesn’t actually exist.

You are right, it would be an absurd claim to make, one that I am not trying to make. I am trying to point out that the image claims something to be true. We both agree that this is not true, or are you going to say at the system does not exist now?

I also said that I believe this some form of propaganda, but that does not have mean that I endorse or refute any claim regarding the west part of the world’s view on this matter.

Please discuess my arguments. Please refrain from “attacking” points I explicitly said I was not making.

The western depiction simply does not exist.

I can and will not argue this point since I lack the proper knowledge on the subject.

We all agree on the fact that a system exists.
From the post:

“Social credit. We don’t have this at all” is a lie. Again, I am not saying anything about how to system works or how it is preceived. I am saying that it exists and the post claimed it does not, nothing else.

That makes it propaganda to me.

TL;DR:

1. The post claims that something that exists does not. This is a fact.
2. I believe this to be propaganda in some form. This is an opinion.

It’s besides the point how it is talked about. The Second screenshot literally says “Social credit. We don’t have this at all” and your link very much proves that they do. Therefore propaganda in my eyes.

That is a super cool implementation of physics.