Ha, thats true. I guess I would argue its not a complete thought, its more of a sentence fragment, or a headline.

What does “jealous body parts” mean? Would you say this phrase randomly to a friend and expect them to understand what you were talking about?

Hello, thanks for posting to shower thoughts.

Rule 2 is that the entire thought should be in the title.

Feel free to use the body to add more info. its a rule to encourage distilling the core thought.

When people report things and i dont take action on the report, i like to add a little comment saying why.

Its not needed but i like to let people know we listen to reports.

Your post is still up. It touches on politics (a political commentator, a political party), but yeah its mostly about a pun, and i can get behind a pun.

This was reported for rule 3 no politics.

Its a pun. A political pun that makes it 50% not politics? And the comments are mostly chill.

… which is true even in cases where your precursor was yourself.

The ukranians are genocidal? Sorry, what?

EDIT: sorry I stirred trouble. I think its good to be critical of any government. From what I know, Ukraine’s military is mostly killing invaders, which is not what I would characturize as a genocide on their part. On the other hand Israel’s military…

This is a rule that could actually be implemented and would help with the slop vs not-slop judgement call

Yeah it makes it a bit if a creative writing exercise.

All good. Thanks for being a part of the community!

Hello, thanks for posting to showerthoughts. This post got reported for rule 2.

The rough idea of rule 2 is that a good shower thought is simple, so it should fit in the title. Its tempting to write a catchy title that is more line a newspaper headline, but that’s not the idea of rule 2.

Mind updating the title?

No worries. Thanks!

Hello, thanks for posting to shower thoughts. Rule 2 is that the title should be a complete thought. The idea is that, shower thoughts are simple so someone shouldn’t need to click on a post to know the thought.

Mind updating the title?

Thanks for posting in showerthoughts. Rule 2 is that the title should be a complete thought. Mind beefing yours up a bit?

Thanks for posting in showerthoughts. Rule 2 is that the title should be a complete thought. Mind beefing yours up a bit?

This website keeps coming up. They do a great job.

In the US, politicians are rarely in on the schemes themselves, they get money more indirectly from lobbyists, superPACs, or insider trading. Are politicians in the UK not able to profit from their votes?

This is sick! Thanks for sharing your project with us! I would have never guessed you could do voice over TOR but PTT was a clever solution. Its like the old nextel phones that had PTT. I wonder if its possible to remap the volume button to be a hardware PTT button.

Would we have OpenTofu if terraform didn’t exist (or the other examples)? They got VCs to fund an open source project, it was a useful tool(probably), the founders got rich, and OpenTofu is now FOSS. Yeah its a run around but the end result, VC funded open source, seems pretty good.

https://tesseract.dubvee.org/post/42620689

It had politics in the title. But yeah it could be argued that it was more meta, idk.

Here is an article. The dude did age: https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/impersonator-jim-carrey-interview-at-french-film-awards-shocks-fans/news-story/a318110b402ce2ec5c4f760707d8dcfc

This is the output of an LLM? I’m just assuming from the username.

I’m not mad, I’m impressed.