Alright, bro. I didn’t pick my own name.
Read what you will into whatever, it’s just my personal opinion.
Alright, bro. I didn’t pick my own name.
Read what you will into whatever, it’s just my personal opinion.
Consistency doesn’t cancel our the immaturity for me, sadly.
What do you mean it checks out? That’s just as immature of a project name.
I can’t take this project name seriously. Like it’s made by weebly pimply teenagers or tweens.


But the time to make use of the betterment dwindles the longer you wait, so you gotta hurry up so you can enjoy it! The FOMO!!!
Oddly culturally specific 😅 I love the perspective! ❤️
You got any hobbies?


Dude you’ve made more in 6–8 months than I had the ambition to accomplish for over a decade now, and I haven’t even started. (Two kids, there’s just no time or energy.)
You’re doing great!


I’m with you on this one. Can’t knock every single product owned by a company assuming all CEOs are Nazis…
But a big red flag is when a company sells itself to a billionaire, or goes public on the stock market. That’s when we should start to worry.


It wasn’t the “controlled by a single company” part that made me leave Twitter, honestly. It was the Nazi CEO…


Northern part of a Nordic country: never during winter; never closed during summer, unless raining.
Stat of release
The image genAI is also from Boston.
I’m asking for your opinion, though. Your understanding of what’s written.
If you just go around saying “what everyone is saying this authority is saying is false, and what I’m “supposing” is correct”, you should back it up with why. With on what you’re basing your supposition. Otherwise you’re just not credible.
Tagging your user profile as “Fact Troll” with a yellow color until further notice. 👍
You know what, decent recognize decent. ❤️ Trolls can go stub a toe.
Thank you for that! 🙏
🙄 Very mature. 👍
I’m not asking what it doesn’t say, in case you missed that. I was asking what it does say, according to you.
(I was quoting your use of supposition because you are supposing stuff instead of making verifiable claims.)
supposition
Would you be willing to elaborate a little more to raise credibility in light of this comment?
Like, what are the links posted saying then, if not the statement in this post, by your expert analysis?
Fully within your right. First impressions matter.