• jystfact@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If not a local llm, then the input given and the output generated is stored and can be used by the corporates in any way they want.

      Once the job is done, a hammer stays a hammer.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        So if it’s local, it’s fine? There’s no problem with the fact that it’s generated, but who owns the tools, then.

        • jystfact@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I guess yeah? Then It’s just a tool to manipulate images just like Photoshop. As I said it’s more about who is pulling the strings.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Gotcha. I largely agree, I think people often see AI images and get a kneejerk reaction on the basis of being AI, not the particulars of how good or bad the image is or the manner in which it was generated.