• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 hours ago

    identical apartments

    Under Communism, we were forced by the government to live in Poor People Houses. It was illegal to tip your landlords. If you updated your wallpaper, the local Commissar would murder your first-born child and eat your dog.

    Incredible.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ever heard of those folks they found in the wild parts of Russia in the late 70s who never even realized the Second World War happened?

    Fucking life goals there

    • MaxLemminist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      IDK

      They wore clothes woven from homegrown hemp, used birch bark for shoes, and routinely faced near-starvation (the mother, Akulina, starved to death during a crop failure in 1961).

  • gnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    To be fair, being good enough isn’t the only reason for something to be in current use.

  • Malica@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Lol I wouldn’t brag on the blocs comrade, there are many problems with them.

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ussr can do good thing. Can also do bad thing.

    Problem with bad things, like bad arguments, lack thought or think about self. Also call self reflection.

    Ask self, apartments good, yes. Ask self, stalin good, on whole probably not. Ask self, authoritarianism good, on whole no is bad. Ask self, shit posting on lemmy good, depends.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why are you writing like that? I looked at your profile; you’ve shown in other places you can write a coherent sentence. So is this some kind of affectation? What are you trying to convey by pretending to be illiterate?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The term authoritarianism is utterly meaningless because all governments rely on coercion to maintain their authority. The state is fundamentally an instrument that’s used by the ruling class to maintain its dominance. The whole notion that political systems can be neatly categorized into authoritarian or democratic binaries is deeply infantile.

      The reality is that every government derives its authority from its monopoly on legal violence. The ability to enforce laws, suppress dissent, and maintain order is derived from control over police, military, and judicial systems. Whether a government is labelled authoritarian or democratic, the fundamental basis of its power lies here. Therefore, the only meaningful questions to ask are which class interests it represents, and to what extent can it be held accountable to them.

      What ultimately matters is which class controls the institutions of state violence. In capitalist democracies, the government represent the interests of the economic elites who fund political campaigns, own media outlets, and control key industries. Western public lacks the mechanisms necessary to hold the government to account, and the ruling class is disconnected from the broader population. That’s precisely what’s driving political discontent all across western sphere today.

      Ask yourself is guzzling western propaganda uncritically good, on the whole no is bad.

    • EmmiLime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ask self, authoritarianism good, on whole no is bad. Ask self, shit posting on lemmy good, depends.

      name a non-authoritarian country