I understand you, but try to see it from a different perspective: by admitting your error you are in fact taking their ammunition away! Continue on and if they try to bring it up again and again you can ask them why they can’t move on, do they have a problem?

hm check iron level is something I read with other symptoms I show as well…maybe it is time to do just that.

I mean, when I see videos of animals yawning, like lions, I get the urge myself to yawn. So definitely a complex topic.

Oh, that construction crew sounds interesting, can you tell me the name?

Nope, burning is reaction with oxygen and Helium for example doesnt react with oxygen. Or at least till now we didn’t manage to find conditions where it does happen. Also stuff like CO2 doesnt burn, its already fully oxidised.

Can’t remember saying that, can you show me where did I say that?

You need to provide some context so people can look into it more.

It was called operation Osoaviakhim and was exactly the same as the USA, the UK and a bit France did.

OK, respect for taking responsibility, but I don’t consider cashier at a gas station to be a job responsible for climate change. At a certain point we all have to participate in the system to not starve. That is by design. So again: don’t beat yourself up too much about it. Vote, demonstrate, but cashier is not a job I see one should be ashamed for.

Why would that be a bad job? You provide a service to the community, that is better than a lot of other, so called prestigious, jobs. You didn’t make the world a worse place at the end of your day. So a lot better than many others.

What is the background to one eyed dragon? Sounds awesome to me.

Ah yes, the USA’s war that was started by them *phone call incoming* wait what, it was started by Russia? Man this conspiracy goes deeper than I thought, they even have agents in the Russian government ಠ_ಠ

As somebody who grew up without religion: I never really cared about all the metaphysical stuff. I was always interested in learning new things and wanted to understand how the world works. Yet that stuff never even brushed my mind to my knowledge. Maybe I asked my parents when I was smaller which I can’t remember anymore, but I definitely didn’t get anxiety over it. I accepted what I saw with my own eyes, that was enough for me. I don’t need something else besides this world.

And regarding their child converting: a cousins child is raised atheist and in elementary school got interested in Christianity since most of their class mates went to church. So the child asked the parents, they said: innour opinion there is nothing, but if you are interested, feel free to go to church to learn about their explanation. So that’s what they did and last I met the child, they weren’t a bible thumbed but still went to their religion class, so the result is not yet in.

I think they just meant that it is true for all countries, since every culture in earth is affected that way. So the distinction “people here come from countries,…” is redundant.

Look, I will quote wikipedia for you:

straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

Calling somebodies god a sky daddy or invisible sky friend is not a fundamentally different thing than calling it god. It is disrespectful, but not a strawman. Nobody is questioning your belief in your god, they are just mocking it.

To give you an example of what actual strawman fallacy looks like, here is one from wikipedia again:

Another example of a strawman argument is U.S. president Richard Nixon’s 1952 “Checkers speech”.[13][14] When campaigning for vice president in 1952, Nixon was accused of having appropriated $18,000 in campaign funds for his personal use. In a televised response, based on Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Fala speech, he spoke about another gift, a dog he had been given by a supporter:[13][14]

It was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate he had sent all the way from Texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl Tricia, six years old, named it Checkers. And, you know, the kids, like all kids, loved the dog, and I just want to say this right now, that, regardless of what they say about it, we are going to keep it.

This was a straw man response; his critics had never criticized the dog as a gift or suggested he return it. This argument was successful at distracting a number of people from the funds and portraying his critics as nitpicking and heartless. Nixon received an outpouring of public support and remained on the ticket. He and Eisenhower were later elected.

Soooo… still Elves then?

That is not how speed works in relativity. Even moving with 10 times the speed of light, you still take “forward time” to move to your end point.

What will be happening though is that your point of reference will seem to travel backwards related to your starting point IF you travel away from your starting point.

So you move with FTL from A to B, then you will see A’s past light, which you overtook while traveling to B, arriving at B, thereby seeing your past “as happening now”, but only at point B. But the time will still be ticking forward. And while you travelled to B, you raced against the light coming from B, meaning you travelled faster into the future of B.

If you then travel back with same speed from B to A, you will still be in the future from when you started in the first place. But you will see yourself standing at B. And again, while travelling from B to A, you raced against the light coming from A, meaning you saw that future happening at FTL speed.

Yeah, Jax is insane, I would have also guessed Zooble with same reason as you said.

I also haven’t experienced it myself, so I should have added that I don’t support that view due to my own lack of evidence.

No idea about quokk, but for db0: from what I read here, the blocking of the tankie triad seems too be pretty effective, so in order to be able to still bother the rest of us, some were looking for alternative servers. And Db0 had the problem of being very open, so they went there. People then complained that more and more db0 users are tankies that can’t discuss faithfully.

That and I also read reports that people don’t want the hassle of bringing back the ammunition. So it’s better to just blindly shoot them than you having to stack them on a train