The reverse of that post I’ve made a week ago…

Rules: pick one movie or series and explain why you actually enjoyed it despite the criticism.

For me: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movies, by far the best ST stuff ever made, I couldn’t take seriously the original universe with the dated effects and stiff acting, same goes for NG… These movies did ST actually great looking and much more believable, not just the effects.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    For me: The JJ Abrams Star Trek movies, by far the best ST stuff ever made, I couldn’t take seriously the original universe with the dated effects and stiff acting, same goes for NG… These movies did ST actually great looking and much more believable, not just the effects.

    Just kidding… but not really.

      • Platypus@lemmings.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Dude if in universe they talk about hyper advanced races or warlords without mercy or AI and all the have is actors in shitty make up or awful “martial arts” and sword fighting, then the new movies are better by default. It’s about immersion

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Breakin’

    Breakin’ 2 Electric Boogaloo

    Surf Ninjas

    All arguably bad. All enjoyable and I have a good time watching them.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I made the mistake of watching dude wheres my car again recently. I enjoyed it as a kid, but the way that trans charcter was done really upset me. I entirely forgot she existed in the movie, but a cis actress who was dubbed with a cis man voice was used to trick the main charcters into making out and then played as gross out humor. Her whole storyline was just flat out upsetting stereotypes.

      The tattoo scene is still a total gem, but the rest of it aged so poorly.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The 90s in general were pretty bad for portrayal of trans and lgb+ characters. Remember Ace Ventura, first one?

        I agree, though, close minded people ruin everything.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Pet detective was my favorite movie growing up, now I try to forget it exists. Most movies haven’t aged well in terms of casual bigotry of all flavors. Yet they still hold value, some more than others. It’s just important to remember they were products of their time. Which makes them good measuring sticks for how audiences have changed. Sometimes the real joke is what I used to find funny as a kid.

  • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Me and about a dozen other people thought John Carter was great. To me, it was just a fun sci-fi/fantasy movie. Never undestood the hate.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      John Carter was only hated by people who follow box office numbers instead of watching movies.

      It was great!

      • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        My gal hates it because she’s a huge fan of the book and apparently they did the whole of it pretty dirty. One of those, “it’s fine if you weren’t hoping to see anything that made the book unique” type movies.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          My go to for that criticism is that it’s a different medium, so it must be different.

          It’s like complaining that a photo of Statue of David doesn’t show the whole statue.

          • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Counterpoint: if I sell you a photograph which I advertised as of the statue of David and it’s just a zoomed in picture of his back, you would be in your rights to complain about leaving out the important parts.