The conversations are amazing

  • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    dunno what your talking about ive never been blocked by government mandate only corporate mandates, and I can just vpn around those.

    • sakodak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The US government literally just effectively banned a social network through government mandate.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        true! of course your hand waving why it was banned and the options they were given. tiktok could have divested from chinese control in the US region they chose not to. in no way has the US government censored information from individuals as a result of that bill. they censured the business operating procedures. two very different and distinct issues when it comes to access to content.

        In no way have americans been prevented from accessing the information within tiktok. compare and contrast that with say trying to find tiananmen square information in china.

        in fact i’ll help everyone out, here is the ruling

        • sakodak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          US users make up about 17% of TikToc’s global user base. Selling their addictive algorithm to keep a small number of users was never going to happen.

          And what hand waving? It was banned because the US government could not control the flow of information to its own people like it can with all the other US corporate/state owned media. The data collection nonsense is just that. If they cared they could have regulated data collection across the board. Foreign countries abide by host countries laws all the time, see GDPR and similar. But that would have cut into the profits of other corporate/state controlled media outlets like Meta and Google.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I didnt say they should/would sell it, just that they had options. The data collection is actually important, thats the hand waving your doing by dismissing it. it is literally a national security problem. you can extrapolate state secrets from mobile location data.

            If they cared they could have regulated data collection across the board.

            they did. they regulated limits on data collection for foreign adversaries. but again that’d require you read and comprehend the bill.

            in no way have they limited speech or prevented people from speaking. the fact the oligarchs control the media is absolutely a problem, but tiktok ban wasnt about information dissemination, it was about information exfiltration.

            so again what information has the US government banned americans from accessing? Im honestly curious, because I’d love to know what information i can’t access.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve been to China. VPN access requires jumping through insane hoops and disguising your traffic as different traffic. Tor is blocked. Most commercial VPNs are IP blocked. HTTPS proxy or HTTP proxy over SSH tunnel gets blocked very quickly due to traffic analysis.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re also not, presumably, a Chinese citizen, who know better how their own internet works. Why would you immediately jump to doing what you know?

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        uh obviously? do you not understand the distinction between corporate and government mandates? I can explain it if you need me to because its kind of critical to this whole conversation. and if you do understand the difference, then wtf is your point.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          My point is that there is no such thing as a truly “free” internet, whether it be by corporations or governments. You might as well be defending unicorns.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            lol, there absolutely is. you just dont partake in it. pray tell me what precisely am I prevented from doing on the internet in my US hellscape, that isnt illegal in general internet not withstanding, which you think should be allowed.