ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square226linkfedilinkarrow-up1550arrow-down112
arrow-up1538arrow-down1imageUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square226linkfedilink
minus-squarebookmeat@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoWe recently had an example of this. See Bun vs Zig. Even if your LLM doesn’t have meaningless tests and assertions, those will not have 100% coverage on any non-trivial code base.
minus-squaredismay3915@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI’ve heard some stuff about bun and zig. Can you point me to what’s the deal?
minus-squareJayjader@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoNot who you asked, but here’s a link to one party’s view (that starts by linking to something posted by another party): https://andrewkelley.me/post/my-thoughts-bun-rust-rewrite.html
We recently had an example of this. See Bun vs Zig. Even if your LLM doesn’t have meaningless tests and assertions, those will not have 100% coverage on any non-trivial code base.
I’ve heard some stuff about bun and zig. Can you point me to what’s the deal?
Not who you asked, but here’s a link to one party’s view (that starts by linking to something posted by another party): https://andrewkelley.me/post/my-thoughts-bun-rust-rewrite.html
Thank you