1Malayali@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoBengal famine, Madras famine, Travancore famine, Wagon massacre, Jallianwala Bagh massacre and much morelemmy.mlimagemessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up1379arrow-down1108
arrow-up1271arrow-down1imageBengal famine, Madras famine, Travancore famine, Wagon massacre, Jallianwala Bagh massacre and much morelemmy.ml1Malayali@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square145linkfedilink
minus-squarejystfact@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 day agoTrue, but it is more of about who is pulling the strings rather than who is underneath.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoHow does using an LLM for a meme support capitalists in any different a way using a hammer does?
minus-squarejystfact@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoIf not a local llm, then the input given and the output generated is stored and can be used by the corporates in any way they want. Once the job is done, a hammer stays a hammer.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agoSo if it’s local, it’s fine? There’s no problem with the fact that it’s generated, but who owns the tools, then.
minus-squarejystfact@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoI guess yeah? Then It’s just a tool to manipulate images just like Photoshop. As I said it’s more about who is pulling the strings.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 day agoGotcha. I largely agree, I think people often see AI images and get a kneejerk reaction on the basis of being AI, not the particulars of how good or bad the image is or the manner in which it was generated.
True, but it is more of about who is pulling the strings rather than who is underneath.
How does using an LLM for a meme support capitalists in any different a way using a hammer does?
If not a local llm, then the input given and the output generated is stored and can be used by the corporates in any way they want.
Once the job is done, a hammer stays a hammer.
So if it’s local, it’s fine? There’s no problem with the fact that it’s generated, but who owns the tools, then.
I guess yeah? Then It’s just a tool to manipulate images just like Photoshop. As I said it’s more about who is pulling the strings.
Gotcha. I largely agree, I think people often see AI images and get a kneejerk reaction on the basis of being AI, not the particulars of how good or bad the image is or the manner in which it was generated.