• stuner@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So it seems like it was rather easy for an IT security professional to create an exploit within 24h of the disclosure. Not sure if every script kiddy can do it, but this means that there are certainly malicious people/organizations who can.

    Ultimately, it seems to me that the only real choice is to patch our (public) systems ASAP these days.

    • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Besides the problem of people being able to do this themselves, there’s the problem of people who develop and sell, or sometimes give away, exploits. The people scrambling to publish POCs without verifying that they’re demonstrating the right vulnerabilities are unintentionally helping out by making it difficult to find how to exploit the real vulnerabilities. Like what are you supposed to search for “php2shell exploit for real not fake?” You almost need an AI agent in a sandbox to download and run all the POCs to weed out the fake ones until one of them becomes well known.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I guess nearly everybody has installed the patch by now. Even myself :)

    Maybe we are going to see “scanner” websites for such patch situations in the future, with a world map and statistics where are how many unpatched servers…

    • INeedMana@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I guess nearly everybody has installed the patch by now

      I admire your belief ;)

      https://php2shell.censys.com/

      ATM almost 80% of scanned services are still vulnerable. Considering that **About 54% of PHP services hide their version** and are not counted as affected or patched.it doesn’t look too good

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Maybe we are going to see “scanner” websites for such patch situations in the future, with a world map and statistics where are how many unpatched servers…

      You mean things that already exist, like https://shodan.io/?

    • stuner@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, hopefully most people had time to install the updates. And maybe the false exploit reports helped slow down malicious people too.

      • Thaurin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Don’t people use unattended upgrades? Crowdsec’s WAF AppSec or Cloudfare’s WAF also put out patches that would’ve caught these vulnerabilities before the official PHP patches were released.

        Of course, those normally run once per 24 hours, which is a little late…

        • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Don’t people use unattended upgrades?

          php can be a real nightmare even with it’s well-attended upgrades :)

          • Thaurin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Well, we’re talking (Debian’s) security updates only here, not major PHP version jumps. :)

        • Luckyfriend222@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No. Unattended upgrades are a nightmare in production. If you patch stuff manually or even with ansible, you can see what the hell broke during the upgrade. Whereas with unattended access you walk in Monday morning with half your systems down and no idea which update broke it.

          • Thaurin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            58 minutes ago

            Yeah, for businesses I can see that, but selfhosting, meh. I have just one personal server firewalled and Wireguarded, so the PHP vulnerability wasn’t even publicly exposed. Even so, I have never had any issues with Debian’s unattended security upgrades in the last 5 years.

            In enterprise environments with a hundred servers, though, you will want to do something else than I do. :)

            But even then, don’t enterprises run a good WAF in front of their public web sites that would have received the patch automatically?

          • needanke@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            For professionals and buisnesses, I see where you are coming from (although there is an argument to be made for prioritizing security over uptime whenever acceptable).

            But for selfhosting/private users? If I wake up one morning and my stuff is not working anymore, I can just roll back to the last good backup and then apply patches manually to see where it goes wrong. Way better to have some downtime when I don’t notice (i.e. don’t need the service) than having open vulnerabilities when a fix exists.