• Luckyfriend222@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No. Unattended upgrades are a nightmare in production. If you patch stuff manually or even with ansible, you can see what the hell broke during the upgrade. Whereas with unattended access you walk in Monday morning with half your systems down and no idea which update broke it.

    • Thaurin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, for businesses I can see that, but selfhosting, meh. I have just one personal server firewalled and Wireguarded, so the PHP vulnerability wasn’t even publicly exposed. Even so, I have never had any issues with Debian’s unattended security upgrades in the last 5 years.

      In enterprise environments with a hundred servers, though, you will want to do something else than I do. :)

      But even then, don’t enterprises run a good WAF in front of their public web sites that would have received the patch automatically?

    • needanke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For professionals and buisnesses, I see where you are coming from (although there is an argument to be made for prioritizing security over uptime whenever acceptable).

      But for selfhosting/private users? If I wake up one morning and my stuff is not working anymore, I can just roll back to the last good backup and then apply patches manually to see where it goes wrong. Way better to have some downtime when I don’t notice (i.e. don’t need the service) than having open vulnerabilities when a fix exists.