Jakylla@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 18 hours agoDavid Revoy - "Do you have the password ?"framapiaf.orgexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1537arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1530arrow-down1external-linkDavid Revoy - "Do you have the password ?"framapiaf.orgJakylla@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square15linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up107·16 hours ago No need to render 100s MB of JS, just to see a two-panel meme.
minus-squareAatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoi think this runs the same problem of how search engines adopting AI summaries are starving their sources of traffic
minus-squareジン@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down5·13 hours agoPls explain so I also don’t make same mistake. How is an avif upload more efficient than a pasted link?
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 hours agoThe image preview was cropped on Voyager. And maybe it’s my connection but i could watch the website building itself. Well, for 2 seconds at least – after the first 5 seconds of nothingness.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·12 hours agoLink loads large data. Image loads small data.
minus-squareKanda@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·6 hours agoWhy use many data when few data do trick?
minus-squareジン@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoThis is super backwards to me, isn’t a link just a string of characters whereas an image is like tons of strings basically?
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoYes, but you have to click the link and load a webpage, and a webpage (usually) has way more data than an image
No need to render 100s MB of JS, just to see a two-panel meme.
i think this runs the same problem of how search engines adopting AI summaries are starving their sources of traffic
Pls explain so I also don’t make same mistake. How is an avif upload more efficient than a pasted link?
The image preview was cropped on Voyager. And maybe it’s my connection but i could watch the website building itself. Well, for 2 seconds at least – after the first 5 seconds of nothingness.
Link loads large data. Image loads small data.
Why use many data when few data do trick?
This is super backwards to me, isn’t a link just a string of characters whereas an image is like tons of strings basically?
Yes, but you have to click the link and load a webpage, and a webpage (usually) has way more data than an image