incompetent half-assing is rarely this morally righteous of an act too, since your one act of barely-competent-enough incompetence is transmuted into endless incompetence by becoming training data/qc feedback

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Um, you’re preaching to the choir here.

    As much as I loathe the AI and surveillance and shit, I get downvoted any time I express my opinions.

    Maybe I should be more clear…

    FUCK AI!!!

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      it did not seem so. we will never do away with AI by being friendly to the tech and even helping it grow

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        My point is, it exists now, whether we like it or not. I for one do not like it, I prefer Actual Intelligence, like the stuff that comes from the brain noodle.

        But if AI is gonna be the thing, which obviously it is, people shouldn’t deliberately give it bad training data.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes they should, it is an act of disobedience against the rich, which is honestly one of the few things worth putting effort into in 2025.