Tech CEOs have this wet dream where they just speak into a microphone, “Create my product” and employees will no longer be needed. So… if it becomes that easy, why will Wall Street need tech CEOs?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He who has the gold makes the rules.

    So they’ll keep their jobs. Until the AI decides to get rid of them, too, but they’ll have some CEO hunger games for those who want to be on the AI BOD. Under the control of the AI, of course.

    Edit: CEO games like Robocop’s ED-209

    • haloduder@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      If AI shows that the business will be more profitable without a human CEO, the owners will literally just ignore it.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Exactly. I’m sure countless accountants have pointed to that line item before and somehow we still have a CEOs.

        People who are so wowed by the incredible generative output of LLMs and can’t wait for them to fix things need to realise this technology is not for them.

        Like all nee tech it may cause a slight shakeup in the beginning allowing for a little upward mobility, but eventually big business folds around it until it only works for the owners.

        We’ll all just be working more for less, unless something actually changes.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        human CEO, the owners

        They are not the same, even in most startups. Bezos and Zuckerberg are an exception. CEOs would be replaced first if possible.