If you had the money to retire at 30, your savings would be invested and on an average year your earnings would cover your expenses. You would have health insurance, so no worries there. The only catch is that you would have to keep your expenses at 65% of what you spend right now. Would you take it, or would you rather work a few more years for a better lifestyle and financial security?

  • Birdie@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You’d still be paying sales tax, income tax, property tax and presumably participating in voting. Plus you’d be opening up a job for another person. All of that is contributing to society, imo.

    I’d probably still volunteer for something. As a retired person, there are a lot of hours to fill!

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Valid reasoning. The volunteering option if you’re financially self sufficient is probably the best option, in light of this.