With the rise of cancel culture, it’s something that’s got me curious, why are so many works (music, literature, tv shows, etc.) no longer separated from their controversial makers? Is it purely to do with money (e.g. not wanting to give money to people you don’t agree with?) and what about controversial people who are dead? They don’t gain anything, so why isn’t the art separated from the artist? What’s your opinion on this topic?
Who are you again?
They’re a participant in this conversation. What’s it to you?
All I’m saying is: I disagree that politics and art are inherently linked/inseparable. What’s so hard to understand about my point here?
Then talk about that instead of trying to shame someone out of conversing with you on this topic.
Ok, so I’ll ask you a sensible question: what is your specific definition of politics?
I still want to know what your definition of politics is, because this:
is baffling to me.
I agree with Velma’s definition. The problem is, she’s claiming it means something it doesnt
Oh do tell us.
So what does it mean?
there it is!