With the rise of cancel culture, it’s something that’s got me curious, why are so many works (music, literature, tv shows, etc.) no longer separated from their controversial makers? Is it purely to do with money (e.g. not wanting to give money to people you don’t agree with?) and what about controversial people who are dead? They don’t gain anything, so why isn’t the art separated from the artist? What’s your opinion on this topic?

  • normalentrance@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    If someone sucks I think about that when observing their art. There is so much good stuff in the world by good people that I don’t see a need to support bad artists.