With the ever-ongoing ‘progress’ of the proposed UK nuclear power plants, I wonder if this is the best course of action (not just in the UK, but across other nations also)?

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hey, I’m in the biz. “Either or” isn’t a thing. We need a completely diversified grid. Mostly nuclear would be ideal with a big chunk coming from solar/wind/hydro. Even fossil fuels have a place in certain applications.

      • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mechanical engineer on the operations side of a large Co-Generation power plant. Partially qualified to operate in a nuke plant too, they just don’t exist in my area.

          • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, all natural gas with number 2 oil (diesel) as a backup. The co part comes from the fact the Brayton and Rankine cycles are working together. The former being how a gas turbine works and the latter being how a steam system works. I can go into more depth but it’s boring. I like renewables, just not as a blanket one size fits all solution. People tend to form an oppinion about this kind of thing based on vibes not reality, experience or math. I’ve worked at hydro plants before and like I said am mostly qualified legally to work in nuclear.