No. Films can be faked too. You just need high quality 4K display to point your camera at. Even forensic can’t tell the difference if you set it up right. Has been done ever since.
Has been done ever since
Oh shit, they got to them before they could explain
In a swiss cheese model of verification maybe
We don’t interact with physical photographs in the way we once did. Ultimately, 99% of our exposure (hehe) to photographs will still end up digitized, so the point is moot. But even in the rare instances of having a physical print, there’s really no evidence of the analog chain being unbroken. And even then, analog photos can be faked, just not with AI.
It would be a nice thing but the industry is too far invested in digital medium for that.
The revealing chemicals are expensive and need to be disposed of in a controlled manner, which implies costs photo shops are not willing to incur.
And there is the supply of fim.
Photo paper and home printers are pretty good these days. Not sure this would solve the deepfake problem.
No.
doctoring photos has been around since photography.
deleted by creator
The negative would be hard evidence the image was not tampered with or generated.
Damn it, I don’t know why I was thinking of professional digital cameras.
