If you had the money to retire at 30, your savings would be invested and on an average year your earnings would cover your expenses. You would have health insurance, so no worries there. The only catch is that you would have to keep your expenses at 65% of what you spend right now. Would you take it, or would you rather work a few more years for a better lifestyle and financial security?

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was morseo talking about retiring at 30. I still think we have a moral obligation to each other to work, if you’re well and able.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m talking about the same thing, but separating paid work from voluntary work.

      Just because you aren’t working for a company, doesn’t mean you aren’t working for your community.

      You’re also probably contributing a lot less carbon to the atmosphere, though.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, as long as it’s beneficial. I don’t think I’d count work where someone may be, for example, building tools to help the rich get richer.