• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Then what is your basis for it only being between two people? You’re defining it just like religion does because that’s where you got the idea even if you don’t realize it.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Because that’s what marriage is and always has been, anything else is contrary to human nature