Interesting in this context is completely divorced from morally good/bad. Could be any group from any area at any time in history. I’ll start with a few, followers of the cult of pythagoras, contemporary black Hebrew Israelites, antiracist skinheads and the Amish (neo-luddites in general). Don’t be racist or a prick to other people discussing.
If for instance one truly believes they should not have existed in the first place then action that would end their existence theoretically shouldn’t be met with resistance as per their own beliefs.
thats rediculous. its not specific to them and the action they take is just not to have kids. if not having a kid is wrong then having one and not 2 is worse. violence and killing is a completely different thing.
I mean multiple nations allow legally assisted suicide. To say that no one should be born or that birthing a person is immoral infers that one’s own birth was immoral which infers it should not have happened to begin with. Now a statement is all well and good until it’s actually applied and one follows their beliefs all the way to all of its conclusions.
who said birthing a person is immoral in this thread? Our species destroying the planet from overuse of what it can provide is immoral. That does come from there being to many of us greedily grabbing for them. Its a knock on effect.
Antinatslism was the topic, the meaning of the word is quite literally in the word itself but here’s the definition for you.
Antinatalism is the philosophical and ethical position that assigns a negative value to birth, arguing that procreation is inherently immoral.
Yeah but I never came in and said I was anti natalist. Just that I got it. And by that I did not mean I got the idea more the way one would use it in conversation. Like I get it. I see why they would feel that way.