I heard a bunch of explanations but most of them seem emotional and aggressive, and while I respect that this is an emotional subject, I can’t really understand opinions that boil down to “theft” and are aggressive about it.

while there are plenty of models that were trained on copyrighted material without consent (which is piracy, not theft but close enough when talking about small businesses or individuals) is there an argument against models that were legally trained? And if so, is it something past the saying that AI art is lifeless?

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I disagree strongly on that argument. I’ve seen many examples of AI generated images that have genuinely made me stop, and shake my head in amazement.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The thing, even with human-made art, is that what’s “moving” is highly personal. Maybe accept that their experience is different from yours?