Am I making sense with that?

Example– a very popular founder and content-creator upon multiple history subs recently retired. Now, I’ve tried to create at least a slow trickle of content with their departure (!historyart@piefed.social is one of the places), but a couple weeks ago someone made a comment that they missed the old days of ~10 new posts a day. Fair! Then I reminded them that there’s 2,000+ posts already made in that community, and whenever they wanted to enjoy more content by the founder, well… it was just sitting there waiting for them.

*crickets*

TBH, that also seems to be the case with my own community. We’re coming up on 700 posts now across 3+yrs, and I’ve put considerable work in to most of those posts, trying to make them mini-articles/editorials as often as possible, but it’s the same thing… very few people want to look through the older content. It’s like everything has to live and die on the stream, so to speak.

I mean-- is automated-posting and doomscrolling just the way it is, these days? And if so, does that have something to do with most people now browsing the Fediverse by mobile, instead of desktop?

Thanks for your opinions on this stuff. I’m honestly kinda baffled…

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    EDIT
    No, I’m the one who’s wrong.

    You seem to be drastically missing the point, if that’s your current conclusion.

    Let’s see if I can figure out things?

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Ok, thanks for clarifying I guess?

      If I’m being honest my real conclusion was “OP seems real whiny about people wanting more content outside of what they’ve been posting”, especially with the “I ‘reminded’ them about the 2000+ posts” remark, but I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt.