• CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess you must be right, since they don’t seem to be as popular as the other options. But Wikipedia says they have a 300+ mile range per full tank, so I’m not sure how that could be less efficient than my diesel truck with the same range.

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You need to use a ton of energy to produce the hydrogen fuel, so just using an EV is much more efficient.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You need to use a ton of energy to produce the hydrogen fuel

        another ton to store it, and another ton to drive it around.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not to forget, that converting it back into water also doesn’t produce that much usable power. You end up with an efficiency of maybe 30-40% compared to an EVs 80-90%

        • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          That too yea. The only thing better than an ev is the fast refueling, but imo that doesn’t matter as you really should take a longish break after 2-300 miles and at that point, just charge your ev while you take a piss or do some stretching.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their main issue with popularity might be options to actually get the fuel. It like in the very beginning of EV cars, only that you can’t even fill it up at home. And h2 cars don’t have the same momentum as EV cars so the chance of that network growing is very slim

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I mean, you could create your own hydrogen at home. Hydrolysis machines exist, and are sometimes sold as medical devices to create pure oxygen from water. The other half of the output is hydrogen, which would need to be captured in a way that you can put it into your car.

        It’s an extremely inefficient way to power a car, though. Converting electricity to hydrogen and back to electricity (as most hydrogen fuel cell cars do) is a ton of loss. It’s also a bunch of complexity, both mechanical and on the operator.

        ETA: fixed typo

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I mean, you could create your own hydrogen at home.

          using electricity. or, just use electricity to power your car.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I mean, technically nothing is stopping you from making your own gasoline either :D But yeah you’d be better advised to just put the power in a battery