I noticed almost everybody here agrees that all AI is bad, and anything produced by AI is slop. and refuse to use any software made in part or in whole with AI or help of AI? Please mention your background and usage of AI with your answer.
I also posted it here.
You’re the one that brought up master’s degree. I’m just saying people need to know how to validate the output.
Just because idiots will misuse something doesn’t magically make it ok for anyone else to misuse a tool, too.
you said “master in a field” that implies a masters degree.
Mastery does not require a piece of paper.
well I did not realize your bar was that nebulous. Honestly its hard to discuss without really knowning what you mean by the statement. Some vague notion of level a person would need to be in your head? 10000 hours?
Why do you insist on being so pedantic over such a simple concept?
I mean this reply is one I would put a mirror up to. You put this level of user knowledge up but you turn around to not only say my assumed definition is wrong, but go on to not further explain it when asked and instead make an ad hominem argument about the nature of my discourse. I mean Im being pretty specific here on the issue. Honestly your issue with something you made at the start pretty much makes our whole discussion kinda pointless. It would have to be restarted with your terms defined. Here is the thing though. Regardless of your definition what I have said would stand. You change change masters degree to whatever you define mastery is. 10k hours whatever. if you wish just change it to the generic mastery phase. The real problem is you out of the blue did not like the master degree supposition I made but it makes no difference in the discourse chain.