It’s been showing up in eerie conversations I can’t legally share
Seems like a pretty good guiding principle, unless you’re the kind of self-serving muppet who skims philosophy texts to find reasons why it’s ethically okay to behave like a selfish dick.
Possibly the scariest cult.
Just billionaire bullshit like the rest of the TESCREAL movement
Sounds like post-modern Western BS. Altruism/prosociality/solidarity are already words, the “effective” just makes it sound like something a scammer would say.
To me it always sounded like victim blaming TBH. Some poor people don’t deserve to be helped, so us effective altruists (who do things to make people poorer) will weigh their souls and help those who want to be helped.
It’s just rich people lying to themselves to justify doing whatever they wanted to do anyway and pretend it’s somehow in humanity’s long term interests. It’s not, and nothing the rich do ever is.
I think that they face a fundamental problem in Hume’s guillotine, where trying to rigorously define “the best” outcomes can lead to strange results when done in an echo chamber. This is best exemplified when taken to the extremes, e.g. the Zizians, an offshoot group of EA who have been rightly disavowed.
Effective Altruism is a plausible-sounding framework, but the practitioners are literal insane people. Should you donate a fixed part of your earnings every pay period to the most effective charities? Yes! But after that, it basically all falls apart and suddenly you’re in Yudowsky’s weird sex cult donating money to some weird crypto scheme.
It’s a shallow, pointless ideology for super-rich motherfuckers who need a way to morally justify their tax evasion and the effects of the poverty that their lifestyles and business practices create.
Tricle down economics with a different name.
No opinion, but the only guy I personally, know who is into it, is a poly-sex-fiend-genocide-denier.
So it kind of tracks with recent posts about EA.
It’s just capitalism and econ101 duct-taped and stapled to utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham is crying.
It’s for psychopath tech bros who’ve got spiders in their brainz.
For example, imagine a myopic billionaire who imagines himself “saving” humanity. If his contributions happen to cause suffering to people alive today, so what? He’s saving “trillions” of people, just in the future. Obviously this means that of all people alive, this billionaire is the only one who really matters. Certainly not Ukrainians who die because he turned off their battlefield communication… hypothetically.
We should have required some basic social science or political science courses in comp sci from the start
A kind of good concept that got taken over by some of the weirdest people around
This is worth a listen for some background on how EA thinking has been influencing the AI world:
https://podcastaddict.com/better-offline/episode/235206311
Short version is that it’s a cult that believes that they are about to bring about a god, and need to ensure they are the ones in control.
To me it just means donating money for mosquito nets, vitamin a supplements, and other “boring” ideas that have a high impact without costing a lot, and doing it through companies that have low overhead costs, so as large a fraction of my donations go to the ones who need it.
But I reckon from the replies to this post that people feel it’s been hijacked by the super rich to feel better about themselves?
Tangent: I went to a Rotary Club meeting once, and it was just a bunch of rich people patting each other on the back for being nice to the poors.
Oh yeah, isn’t that the point of rotary, to be a club for internal admiration?
they are enormously genorous for not just ending the homeless problem with mass execution
I like the all-lowercase concept of effective altruism (making the most out of limited resources) but the organizations claiming that name are shady af
