ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoInheritancelemmy.curiana.netimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageInheritancelemmy.curiana.netExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoFor some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago For some reason It’s because “every language must do OOP”. Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.
For some reason, COBOL has had OOP features since 2002.
It’s because “every language must do OOP”.
Every SQL engine does it… SWI Prolog seems to have escaped, but COBOL had no chance.