• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Liberalism didn’t exist for most of history, so trying to invoke “history” to argue that liberalism has some kind of timeless and eternal claim to being on the left is unconvincing. Yes, liberalism was the left in the eighteenth century, but we’re in the twenty first century.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The division of political ideologies into left and right derives from the French Parliament which had the monarchists on the right and the liberals on the left.

      Every reference to right and left stems from this so yes in fact Liberalism has always been where the left starts even if liberals are nit leftists because the political left is anti-authoritarian.

      The binary has not changed and I promise you any claim ypu make to the contrary is going to be mired in euro-centric beliefs.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The division of political ideologies into left and right derives from the French Parliament which had the monarchists on the right and the liberals on the left.

        The names yes, but the basic conflict is much older, Europe itself had the Guelph-Ghibelline conflict.

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Perhaps it us my American education in geography, but isn’t France still part of Europe?

          The Gelph-Ghibelline conflict was about secular monarchism vs religious authority. Im not sure I see the point you’re making.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            isn’t France still part of Europe?

            It is, it’s the UK that left (the EU, not the continent).

            The Gelph-Ghibelline conflict was about secular monarchism vs religious authority. Im not sure I see the point you’re making.

            That the conflict between feudal lords (French aristocrats / Ghibellines) and urban merchants (Guelph burghers / French Girondists) is much older than the French Revolution. The pope and emperor were the figureheads, but the lords and merchants were the power blocs.